8 CFR 208.10 - Failure to appear at an interview before an asylum officer or failure to follow requirements for fingerprint processing

Cite as8 CFR 208.10
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
59 practice notes
  • Procedures for Credible Fear Screening and Consideration of Asylum, Withholding of Removal, and CAT Protection Claims by Asylum Officers
    • United States
    • Executive Office For Immigration Review
    • Invalid date
    ...does not grant asylum to an applicant after an interview or hearing conducted in accordance with 8 CFR 208.9, or if, as provided in 8 CFR 208.10, the applicant is deemed to have waived his or her right to an interview, a hearing, or an adjudication by an asylum officer, the asylum officer s......
  • Introduction to the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions-Fall 2018
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 16, 2018
    • November 16, 2018
    ...CFR Citation: 8 CFR 103.2(b)(9); 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1)(i)(C); 8 CFR 103.16; 8 CFR 204.2(d)(2)(vi); 8 CFR 204.3(c)(3); 8 CFR 204.5(p)(4); 8 CFR 208.10; 8 CFR 210.2(c)(2)(i); 8 CFR 210.5(b)(2); 8 CFR 214.1(f); 8 CFR 214.11(a); 8 CFR 214.11(m)(2); 8 CFR 236.5; 8 CFR 240.68(b); 8 CFR 245.21(b); 8 C......
  • Hotel and Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. Smith, No. 84-5859
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • May 20, 1988
    ...forwarded to INS. When the application returns to INS, the applicant may inspect, explain, and rebut the Bureau's advisory opinion. 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.10(b). The INS decisionmaker must examine the individual asylum applicant personally before resolving the application. Id. Sec. 208.6. In the......
  • Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. Attorney General, No. 84-5859
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • January 12, 1987
    ...forwarded to INS. When the application returns to INS, the applicant may inspect, explain, and rebut the Bureau's advisory opinion. 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.10(b). The INS decisionmaker must examine the individual asylum applicant personally before resolving the application. Id. Sec. 208.6. In the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
56 cases
  • Hotel and Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. Smith, No. 84-5859
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • May 20, 1988
    ...forwarded to INS. When the application returns to INS, the applicant may inspect, explain, and rebut the Bureau's advisory opinion. 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.10(b). The INS decisionmaker must examine the individual asylum applicant personally before resolving the application. Id. Sec. 208.6. In the......
  • Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. Attorney General, No. 84-5859
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • January 12, 1987
    ...forwarded to INS. When the application returns to INS, the applicant may inspect, explain, and rebut the Bureau's advisory opinion. 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.10(b). The INS decisionmaker must examine the individual asylum applicant personally before resolving the application. Id. Sec. 208.6. In the......
  • Carvajal-Munoz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, CARVAJAL-MUNO
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • September 12, 1984
    ...No. 2922, slip op. at 7 (BIA Dec. 29, 1982). If the immigration judge grants an asylum request, it is for a period of one year. See 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.10(e) (1984). Thereafter, the applicant is interviewed annually to determine continuing eligibility for asylum or adjustment of status, which......
  • Singh v. Nelson, No. 85 CIV. 3141 (PKL).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • December 12, 1985
    ...opinions on those claims were sought from the Department of State, Bureau of Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs, pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 208.10(b) (1985). These regulations provide that hearings before an immigration judge should be held after the State Department renders an opinion. In t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT