50 CFR 424.11 - Factors for listing, delisting, or reclassifying species
| Cite as | 50 CFR 424.11 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
416 practice notes
-
Endangered and Threatened Species; Identification of 14 Distinct Population Segments of the Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) and Revision of Species-Wide Listing
...of existing regulatory mechanisms; and other natural or manmade factors affecting a species' continued existence (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)(1); 50 CFR 424.11(c)). We evaluate demographic risk factors (i.e., abundance and trend information) in conjunction with the section 4(a)(1) factors. The demogr......
-
Humane Soc'y of U.S. v. Jewell, Civil Action No. 13–186 BAH
...or if the original listing was based on data, or data interpretation, that were in error.2003 Rule, 68 Fed. Reg. at 15,859 (citing 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(d) ) (emphasis added). Noticeably absent from this statement is any mention of delisting “a portion of a listed species' historical range” by......
-
Viva! International Voice v. Adidas, Inc., No. S140064.
...species in the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant part of [their] range." (60 Fed.Reg. 12904 (Mar. 9, 1995); see 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(d)(2) (2007) [authorizing delisting where a species has recovered].) It characterized the red, eastern grey, and western grey populations as "a......
-
Survivors v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, Case No. 16-cv-01165-JCS
...threats in the context of the species' small population sizes" and therefore, that they violated the ESA. Id. at 27 (citing 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(c) ; WildEarth Guardians v. Salazar , 741 F.Supp.2d 89 (D.D.C. 2010) ).Defendants assert that the Service "examined threats – both individually and ......
Request a trial to view additional results
62 cases
-
Humane Soc'y of U.S. v. Jewell, Civil Action No. 13–186 BAH
...or if the original listing was based on data, or data interpretation, that were in error.2003 Rule, 68 Fed. Reg. at 15,859 (citing 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(d) ) (emphasis added). Noticeably absent from this statement is any mention of delisting “a portion of a listed species' historical range” by......
-
Viva! International Voice v. Adidas, Inc., No. S140064.
...species in the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant part of [their] range." (60 Fed.Reg. 12904 (Mar. 9, 1995); see 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(d)(2) (2007) [authorizing delisting where a species has recovered].) It characterized the red, eastern grey, and western grey populations as "a......
-
Survivors v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, Case No. 16-cv-01165-JCS
...threats in the context of the species' small population sizes" and therefore, that they violated the ESA. Id. at 27 (citing 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(c) ; WildEarth Guardians v. Salazar , 741 F.Supp.2d 89 (D.D.C. 2010) ).Defendants assert that the Service "examined threats – both individually and ......
-
Blackwater v. Salazar, No. 11–5128.
...basis of recovery only if the best scientific and commercial data available indicate that it is no longer endangered or threatened,” 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(d)(2) (1984) (promulgated prior to the 1988 ESA Amendments), must be viewed in light of Congress's distinction between “survival” and “reco......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Trump Administration Finalizes New Endangered Species Act Regulations
...information on economic or other impacts in the course of listing determination.”[10] Second, the Services added a new paragraph to 50 C.F.R. § 424.11 defining how FWS will consider the “foreseeable future.” The ESA defines a “threatened species” as “any species which is likely to become en......
-
Biden Administration Asks Supreme Court to Reject Challenge to ESA Rule
...by predator control, protection of habitat and food supply, or other conservation practices.”16 U.S.C. § 1533(b)(1)(A); see also 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(g). In particular, the PECE Rule directs the Services to evaluate conservation measures against listed criteria to determine if the conservatio......
-
DC District Court Bats Down Northern Long-Eared Bat Listing
...and (E) other natural or manmade factors affecting a species’ continued existence.” 16 U.S.C § 1533(a)(1)(A)-(E); see also 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(c). [9] Everson at [10] Final SPR Policy, 79 Fed. Reg. 37,577 (July 1, 2014). [11] Id. at *17-18. [12] Id. at *19 (citing Defenders of Wildlife v. No......
1 books & journal articles
-
Continued protection of the bald eagle after delisting.
...of existing regulatory mechanisms; and other natural or man-made factors affecting the species' continued existence. Pursuant to 50 CFR 424.11(d), the factors that must be evaluated for delisting are 1) the species is extinct; 2) the species has recovered and is no longer endangered and thr......