14 CFR 253.7 - Explanation of incorporated terms
| Cite as | 14 CFR 253.7 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
All World Professional Travel v. American Airlines, No. ED CV 02-849 RT.
...by American were Permissible under Federal Law The federal law that American claims permits it to impose the subject penalties is 14 C.F.R. § 253.7 ("Section 253.7"). American argues that under this provision, airlines are specifically permitted to set "terms restricting refunds of the tick......
-
Buck v. American Airlines, Inc., No. 06-1625.
...raise the price, unless the passenger receives conspicuous written notice of the salient features of those terms on or with the ticket. 14 C.F.R. § 253.7. The plaintiffs claim that the retained fees constitute a forbidden monetary penalty, imposed without due notice. In this connection, the......
-
Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections
...purchase is included in the conditions of carriage and the consumer receives direct notice of that provision on or with the ticket. See 14 CFR 253.7. The Department has found that some sellers of air transportation are abusing this rule by burying provisions purporting to permit them to rai......
-
Leonard v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., No. C0-99-948.
...trade practices of the airlines. Id. at 228 n. 4, 115 S.Ct. at 823 n. 4. The DOT has used this authority to regulate reissue fees. 14 CFR § 253.7 (1999). Although the DOT has chosen only to require conspicuous notice of the fees, it could also choose to regulate the amounts. Thus, while Leo......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
All World Professional Travel v. American Airlines, No. ED CV 02-849 RT.
...by American were Permissible under Federal Law The federal law that American claims permits it to impose the subject penalties is 14 C.F.R. § 253.7 ("Section 253.7"). American argues that under this provision, airlines are specifically permitted to set "terms restricting refunds of the tick......
-
Buck v. American Airlines, Inc., No. 06-1625.
...raise the price, unless the passenger receives conspicuous written notice of the salient features of those terms on or with the ticket. 14 C.F.R. § 253.7. The plaintiffs claim that the retained fees constitute a forbidden monetary penalty, imposed without due notice. In this connection, the......
-
Leonard v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., No. C0-99-948.
...trade practices of the airlines. Id. at 228 n. 4, 115 S.Ct. at 823 n. 4. The DOT has used this authority to regulate reissue fees. 14 CFR § 253.7 (1999). Although the DOT has chosen only to require conspicuous notice of the fees, it could also choose to regulate the amounts. Thus, while Leo......
-
Lilian Onoh v. Nw. Airlines Inc., No. 09-10971.
...injured passengers. See, e.g., 49 U.S.C. § 41712 (2010) (providing remedial process for unfair and deceptive practices by airlines); 14 C.F.R. § 253.7 (2010) (remedy for failure to provide adequate notice of price-related contractual terms); 14 C.F.R. § 250.1-.9 (2010) (remedy for denied bo......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
DOT Denies Petitions to Initiate Consumer Protection Rulemakings
...regarding the disclosure of cancellation policies and/or change fees, including 14 C.F.R. 221.107(d) (direct notice of certain terms); 14 C.F.R. 253.7 (direct notice of certain items); 14 C.F.R. 259.5(b)(4) (24-hour post-reservation cancellation rule); 14 C.F.R. 259.5(b)(9) (customer servic......