27 CFR 555.141 - Exemptions

Cite as27 CFR 555.141
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 13, 2007
    • April 13, 2007
    ...are explosives, ATF's explosives storage regulations do not apply to the storage of ammunition as defined in 27 CFR 555.11 (see 27 CFR 555.141(a)(4)). Thus, OSHA's existing Sec. 1910.109(j) covering the storage of small arms ammunition and components of small arms ammunition are not preempt......
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part III Labor Department, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 13, 2007
    • April 13, 2007
    ...are explosives, ATF's explosives storage regulations do not apply to the storage of ammunition as defined in 27 CFR 555.11 (see 27 CFR 555.141(a)(4)). Thus, OSHA's existing Sec. 1910.109(j) covering the storage of small arms ammunition and components of small arms ammunition are not preempt......
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Justice Department, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau,
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 20, 2003
    • March 20, 2003
    ...to and in connection with commercial transportation will violate 18 U.S.C. 842(i) irrespective of DOT's regulation. ATF has amended 27 CFR 555.141(a)(1) to include language clarifying the DOT exception of 18 U.S.C. ATF has recently been advised that the trucking industry may employ persons ......
  • Safe Explosives Act; implementation,
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 20, 2003
    • March 20, 2003
    ...to and in connection with commercial transportation will violate 18 U.S.C. 842(i) irrespective of DOT's regulation. ATF has amended 27 CFR 555.141(a)(1) to include language clarifying the DOT exception of 18 U.S.C. ATF has recently been advised that the trucking industry may employ persons ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 cases
  • Tripoli Rocketry v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, No. 04-5453.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • February 10, 2006
    ...have exempted, inter alia, "propellant actuated devices ... manufactured, imported, or distributed for their intended purposes." See 27 C.F.R. § 555.141(a)(8) (2005) (current exemption); 26 C.F.R. § 181.141(i) (1972) (initial exemption). "Propellant actuated device" is defined to mean: "Any......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT