Evaluation of disability of adults, in general

CurrencyCurrent through May 31, 2023
Citation 20 C.F.R. §416.920

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1163 cases
  • Ford v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., Civ. No. 2:12-cv-3857 (KM)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • March 31, 2014
    ...("SSA") has established a five-step evaluation process for determining whether a claimant is entitled to benefits. 20 CFR §§ 404.1520, 416.920; see also Plummer v. Apfel, 186 F.3d 422, 428 (3d Cir. 1999).Step 1: Determine whether the claimant has engaged in substantial gainful activity sinc......
  • Rodriguez v. Berryhill, 16 Civ. 8752 (AJP)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 28, 2017
    ...cases). The Commissioner's regulations set forth a five-step sequence to be used in evaluating disability claims. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520, 416.920; see, e.g., Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 24-25, 124 S. Ct. 376, 379-80 (2003); Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140, 107 S. Ct. 2287, 2291 (198......
  • O'Dell v. Colvin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • November 22, 2016
    ...cases). The Commissioner's regulations set forth a five-step sequence to be used in evaluating disability claims. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520, 416.920; see, e.g., Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 24-25, 124 S. Ct. 376, 379-80 (2003); Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140, 107 S. Ct. 2287, 2291 (198......
  • Jodie J. v. O'Malley
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • July 4, 2024
    ... ... for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security ... income under Titles ... claimant is or is not disabled, the evaluation ends ... Id ...           V ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
19 books & journal articles
  • Myofascial Pain and Trigger Points
    • United States
    • ABA General Library ABA Medical-Legal Guides. The Spine for Lawyers Part 2. The Spine
    • March 1, 2013
    ...81 42 U.S.C.A. § 423(d)(2)(A) (West 2004). 82 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1508, 416.908 (1991). 83 Id . 84 Id . 85 See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520, 416.920 (2003); Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140–42 (1987). 86 Lacroix v. Barnhart, 465 F.3d 881, 888 n.3 (8th Cir. 2006). 87 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(a)(4)(i),......
  • Pain
    • United States
    • ABA General Library ABA Medical-Legal Guides. The Spine for Lawyers Part 1. The Building Blocks of Human Anatomy
    • March 1, 2013
    ...(A)). 97 42 U.S.C.A. § 423(d)(2)(A) (West 2004). 98 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1508, 416.908 (1991). 99 Id. 100 Id. 101 See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520, 416.920 (2003); Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140–42 (1987). 102 Lacroix v. Barnhart, 465 F.3d 881, 888 n.3 (8th Cir. 2006). 103 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(a......
  • The Social Security Disability Appeals Backlog Crisis and the Necessity of Radical Reform
    • United States
    • Capital University Law Review No. 45-3, June 2017
    • June 1, 2017
    ...or $1,820 per month for blind claimants). 8 § 404.1520(a)(4)(ii). 9 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(c) (2016); 20 C.F.R. § 404.1521(a) (2016); 20 C.F.R. § 416.920(c) (2016); Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 153 (1987). 10 See SSR 86-8, S.S.R. Cum. Ed. (1986) (elaborating on policy that was effective on......
  • Section 49 Step 4-Past Relevant Work
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Practice Books Social Security Administration Practice and Procedure Guidebook Chapter 3 Sequential Disability Evaluation Process
    • Invalid date
    ...in the national economy. Both tests must be applied, and the claimant is not disabled if either test is met. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 and 416.920; SSRs 82-61 and 00-4p.If the SSA determines the claimant's RFC and finds that the claimant is not able to perform past relevant work, this finding m......
  • Get Started for Free