29 CFR 1926.600 - Equipment

Cite as29 CFR 1926.600
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Harry C. Crooker v. Occupational Safety and Health, No. 07-2770.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • August 11, 2008
    ...by an OSHA regulation governing the operation of mechanized equipment in the vicinity of energized, non-insulated power lines. See 29 C.F.R. § 1926.600(a)(6).1 Warner wrote up the violation and demanded immediate abatement of the Several months later, OSHA issued a formal citation and impos......
  • Alcus v. Bainbridge Twp., NO. 2019-G-0205
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Ohio)
    • February 18, 2020
    ...brake. In addition, the applicable OSHA regulation states "[w]henever the equipment is parked, the parking brake shall be set." See 29 C.F.R. 1926.600(a)(3)(ii). The Township held regular safety meetings and provided safety programs and OSHA-related training. Operators of the backhoe were t......
  • Bailey v. M.B.C. Constr. Co., No. A-19-156
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Nebraska
    • February 18, 2020
    ...testified that the government regulations which specifically pertained to construction sites are promulgated by OSHA and are found at 29 CFR 1926. He explained OSHA is an agency under the Department of Labor that basically governs all of the safety aspects in the general construction indust......
  • Rivera v. City of Meriden, No. CV04-4000526-S (CT 3/23/2006), No. CV04-4000526-S
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • March 23, 2006
    ...necessary precautions to comply with OSHA requirements, including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v), 29 CFR 1926.454(a), 29 CFR 1926.600(a)(6), 29 CFR 1926.550(a)(15), and 29 CFR 1926.416(a), as required by the (d) Milestone failed to notify The Connecticut Light and Power Compa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Harry C. Crooker v. Occupational Safety and Health, No. 07-2770.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • August 11, 2008
    ...by an OSHA regulation governing the operation of mechanized equipment in the vicinity of energized, non-insulated power lines. See 29 C.F.R. § 1926.600(a)(6).1 Warner wrote up the violation and demanded immediate abatement of the Several months later, OSHA issued a formal citation and impos......
  • Alcus v. Bainbridge Twp., NO. 2019-G-0205
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Ohio)
    • February 18, 2020
    ...brake. In addition, the applicable OSHA regulation states "[w]henever the equipment is parked, the parking brake shall be set." See 29 C.F.R. 1926.600(a)(3)(ii). The Township held regular safety meetings and provided safety programs and OSHA-related training. Operators of the backhoe were t......
  • Bailey v. M.B.C. Constr. Co., No. A-19-156
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Nebraska
    • February 18, 2020
    ...testified that the government regulations which specifically pertained to construction sites are promulgated by OSHA and are found at 29 CFR 1926. He explained OSHA is an agency under the Department of Labor that basically governs all of the safety aspects in the general construction indust......
  • Rivera v. City of Meriden, No. CV04-4000526-S (CT 3/23/2006), No. CV04-4000526-S
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • March 23, 2006
    ...necessary precautions to comply with OSHA requirements, including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v), 29 CFR 1926.454(a), 29 CFR 1926.600(a)(6), 29 CFR 1926.550(a)(15), and 29 CFR 1926.416(a), as required by the (d) Milestone failed to notify The Connecticut Light and Power Compa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Review Commission Overrules 34 year-old Precedent Regarding Motor Vehicles in Construction
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • October 20, 2015
    ...thus electrocuting the employee who was holding the chain. Lake Erie received a citation for $70,000 for a willful violation of 29 C.F.R. § 1926.600(a)(3). The question at issue was whether or not the “pounder truck” was covered under Subpart O, 29 C.F.R. § 1926.601(a) which states: Coverag......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT