10 CFR 51.52 - Environmental effects of transportation of fuel and waste-Table S-4

Cite as10 CFR 51.52
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
61 practice notes
  • State of N.J., Dept. of Environmental Protection and Energy v. Long Island Power Authority, No. 93-5613
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • July 19, 1994
    ...fuel, but included a finding that the impact from transporting the nuclear fuel would be minimal, based on application of Table S-4, 10 C.F.R. Sec. 51.52. The NRC issued the amendment June 23, The parties disagree about when NJDEPE learned of LIPA's plans to ship by barge. NJDEPE states tha......
  • Concerned Citizens of RI v. NUCLEAR REG. COM., Civ. A. No. 76-520.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Rhode Island
    • April 26, 1977
    ...proceeding, and may present all of their claims to the NRC.7 Regulations ensure that the EIS will be considered in the hearing process, 10 CFR § 51.52. See Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Committee v. AEC, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 33, 449 F.2d 1109 (1971). If NEP proves unable to produce the necessary......
  • Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n, Nos. 74-1586
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • November 29, 1982
    ...may take a position and offer evidence as well. The presiding officer will then decide the matters in controversy among the parties. 10 C.F.R. § 51.52(b) (1981). If such matters are resolved by rule, they are generally not subject to attack by way of discovery, proof, argument or other mean......
  • Production and utilization facilities; domestic licensing: water power reactors; criticality accident requirements,
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 12, 1998
    • November 12, 1998
    ...to 5-weight percent on the basis of possible criticality concerns even in a dry environment, as well as currently approved extensions to 10 CFR 51.52 based on an environmental impact study for enrichments higher than 5- weight percent. Any future approved enrichment extension can be readily......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • State of N.J., Dept. of Environmental Protection and Energy v. Long Island Power Authority, No. 93-5613
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • July 19, 1994
    ...fuel, but included a finding that the impact from transporting the nuclear fuel would be minimal, based on application of Table S-4, 10 C.F.R. Sec. 51.52. The NRC issued the amendment June 23, The parties disagree about when NJDEPE learned of LIPA's plans to ship by barge. NJDEPE states tha......
  • Concerned Citizens of RI v. NUCLEAR REG. COM., Civ. A. No. 76-520.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Rhode Island
    • April 26, 1977
    ...proceeding, and may present all of their claims to the NRC.7 Regulations ensure that the EIS will be considered in the hearing process, 10 CFR § 51.52. See Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Committee v. AEC, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 33, 449 F.2d 1109 (1971). If NEP proves unable to produce the necessary......
  • Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n, Nos. 74-1586
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • November 29, 1982
    ...may take a position and offer evidence as well. The presiding officer will then decide the matters in controversy among the parties. 10 C.F.R. § 51.52(b) (1981). If such matters are resolved by rule, they are generally not subject to attack by way of discovery, proof, argument or other mean......
  • New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n, Nos. 77-1219
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • August 22, 1978
    ...the 7,000 foot location, and issued initial decisions granting the construction permit. In doing so, the Licensing Board relied on 10 C.F.R. § 51.52(b)(3) which provides "an initial decision of the presiding officer may include findings and conclusions which affirm or modify the content of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT