38 C.F.R. 17.36 - Enrollment-provision of hospital and outpatient care to veterans

Cite as38 C.F.R. 17.36
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
40 practice notes
  • Introduction to Regulatory Plan and Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, 64075-64305 [05-21048]
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 31, 2005
    • October 31, 2005
    ...7 AND 8 AND ENROLLMENT LEVEL DECISION Priority: Economically Significant. Major under 5 USC 801. Legal Authority: PL 104-262 CFR Citation: 38 CFR 17.36 Legal The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2003, an interim final rule amending VA's me......
  • Valentini v. Shinseki, Case No. CV 11–04846 SJO (MRWx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • March 16, 2012
    ...(FAC ¶ 74; 38 U.S.C. § 101(2).) To receive the “medical benefits package,” a veteran must be enrolled in the VA health-care system. See38 C.F.R. § 17.36(a)(1). Veterans who qualify for VHA benefits are placed into one of eight priority groups. See38 C.F.R. § 17.36(b). The priority groups ar......
  • Vietnam Veterans of Am. v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, No. C 09-0037 CW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • July 24, 2013
    ...38 C.F.R. § 1738(a). To receive the medical benefits package, a veteran must generally be enrolled in the DVA health-care system. 38 C.F.R. §§ 17.36(a), 17.37. Veterans who qualify for enrollment are placed into one of eight priority groups. 38 C.F.R. § 17.36(b). Assignment to a priority gr......
  • Vietnam Veterans of Am. v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, No. C 09-0037 CW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • November 19, 2013
    ...38 C.F.R. § 1738(a). To receive the medical benefits package, a veteran must generally be enrolled in the DVA health-care system. 38 C.F.R. §§ 17.36(a), 17.37. Veterans who qualify for enrollment are placed into one of eight priority groups. 38 C.F.R. § 17.36(b). Assignment to a priority gr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Valentini v. Shinseki, Case No. CV 11–04846 SJO (MRWx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • March 16, 2012
    ...(FAC ¶ 74; 38 U.S.C. § 101(2).) To receive the “medical benefits package,” a veteran must be enrolled in the VA health-care system. See38 C.F.R. § 17.36(a)(1). Veterans who qualify for VHA benefits are placed into one of eight priority groups. See38 C.F.R. § 17.36(b). The priority groups ar......
  • Vietnam Veterans of Am. v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, No. C 09-0037 CW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • July 24, 2013
    ...38 C.F.R. § 1738(a). To receive the medical benefits package, a veteran must generally be enrolled in the DVA health-care system. 38 C.F.R. §§ 17.36(a), 17.37. Veterans who qualify for enrollment are placed into one of eight priority groups. 38 C.F.R. § 17.36(b). Assignment to a priority gr......
  • Vietnam Veterans of Am. v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, No. C 09-0037 CW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • November 19, 2013
    ...38 C.F.R. § 1738(a). To receive the medical benefits package, a veteran must generally be enrolled in the DVA health-care system. 38 C.F.R. §§ 17.36(a), 17.37. Veterans who qualify for enrollment are placed into one of eight priority groups. 38 C.F.R. § 17.36(b). Assignment to a priority gr......
  • Heino v. Shinseki, No. 2011–7160.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • June 28, 2012
    ...in priority categories 7 and 8. Copayments for Medications After June 30, 2010, 75 Fed.Reg. 32,670, 32,670–32,671 (June 9, 2010); see38 C.F.R. § 17.36 (establishing order of priority). Most recently, the VA again extended the $8 copayment freeze for priority categories 2 through 6 until 201......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT