29 CFR 5.6 - Enforcement
| Cite as | 29 CFR 5.6 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
53 practice notes
-
Establishing a Minimum Wage for Contractors
...English. Section 10.41(b) states the well-established policy of the Department with respect to confidential sources. See 29 CFR 4.191(a); 29 CFR 5.6(a)(5). Proposed Sec. 10.42 establishes an informal complaint resolution process for complaints filed with the WHD. The provision would allow W......
-
Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors
...Proposed Sec. 13.41(b) states the well-established policy of the Department with respect to confidential sources. See 29 CFR 4.191(a); 29 CFR 5.6(a)(5). Specifically, it would provide that it is the Department's policy to protect the identity of its confidential sources and to prevent an un......
-
Establishing a Minimum Wage for Contractors
...Proposed Sec. 10.41(b) stated the well-established policy of the Department with respect to confidential sources. See 29 CFR 4.191(a); 29 CFR 5.6(a)(5). As the Department received no substantive comments on this section, the final rule implements Sec. 10.41 as NELP suggested the Department ......
-
Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors
...Proposed Sec. 13.41(b) stated the well-established policy of the Department with respect to confidential sources. See 29 CFR 4.191(a); 29 CFR 5.6(a)(5). Specifically, it provided that it is the Department's policy to protect the identity of its confidential sources and to prevent an unwarra......
Request a trial to view additional results
44 cases
-
Framlau Corporation v. Dembling, Civ. A. No. 72-1156.
...to present evidence in rebuttal at an informal proceeding before the Regional Director in Philadelphia. Subsequently, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 5.6(c), this informal hearing was held in Philadelphia on November 25, 1969. The Regional Director as Hearing Officer, considered the oral testimony ......
-
Favel v. American Renovation and Const. Co., No. 01-514.
...contract. In other words, the contracting officer has the authority to determine when the Davis-Bacon Act applies to a federal project. 29 C.F.R. § 5.6(a)(1). ¶ 23 The regulations require that the federal contracting agency, in this case the USAF, "shall cause such investigations to be made......
-
Idaho Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. Inland Pac. Chapter Builders & Contractors, Inc., Nos. 11–35985
...for three years. Id. § 3144(b). DOL's regulations also provide for administrative enforcement of the Davis–Bacon Act. See, e.g., 29 C.F.R. §§ 5.6, 5.7, 5.9, 5.11, 5.12. Federal law does not establish criminal penalties for violations of Davis–Bacon. See United States v. Clark, 787 F.3d 451,......
-
Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. T & H Servs., 20-1187
...D.C. would suddenly owe approximately $20 million in backpay." (citing 29 C.F.R. § 1.6(f) )).10 See 40 U.S.C. §§ 3143 –45 ; 29 C.F.R. § 5.6 ; 48 C.F.R. § 22.406-1(a) ("Contracting agencies are responsible for ensuring the full and impartial enforcement of labor standards in the administrati......
Request a trial to view additional results