Employment of manipulative and deceptive devices

CurrencyCurrent through May 31, 2023
Citation 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
279 cases
  • In re New York City Municipal Securities Litigation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • January 25, 1980
    ...Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act" or the "1934 Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. Eleven separate lawsuits have been consolidated for pretrial matters in this litigation.3 In five of the actions, the City is named as a ......
  • Bajjuri v. Raytheon Techs. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Arizona
    • November 18, 2022
    ...605 (9th Cir. 2014) ("Rule 9(b) applies to all elements of a securities fraud action"); see also 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78u-4(b)(1); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. III. The Court begins with a housekeeping item. In Motion II, Raytheon asks the Court to notice materials attached to Motion I as Exhibit......
  • SS Richmond LLC v. Harrison
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • November 9, 2022
    ...28 U.S.C. § 1658(b) governs the statute of limitations for Plaintiffs' securities fraud claim pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. Section 1658(b) states:a private right of action that involves a claim of fraud, deceit, manipulation, or contrivance in contravention of a......
  • In re Bos. Sci. Corp. Sec. Litig.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • December 20, 2022
    ...caused artificial inflation of Boston Scientific common stock, in violation of Section 10(b), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (Count I) and in violation of Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a) (Count Defendants have moved to dismi......
  • Get Started for Free
94 firm's commentaries
54 books & journal articles
  • Securities Fraud
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 62-3, July 2025
    • July 1, 2025
    ...concerning public offerings of securities in commerce”). 4. United Hous. Found., Inc. v. Forman, 421 U.S. 837, 849 (1975). 5. 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (2024). 1030 AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW [Vol. 62:1029 (“SEC”) under § 10(b) of the 1934 Act,6 the violation of which is criminalized by § 32(......
  • Securities fraud
    • United States
    • American Criminal Law Review No. 61-3, July 2024
    • July 1, 2024
    ...facili- ties of any national securities exchange,14 made (2) a misstatement or omission15 5. 15 U.S.C. § 78ff(a) (“Penalties”). 6. 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (2023). 7. 15 U.S.C. § 8. Id. § 78ff(a). 9. The term “blue sky” refers to the practice of land salesmen who operated so fraudulently that ......
  • Corporate Combinations
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Corporate Counsel Guides: Corporation Law
    • July 3, 2012
    ...1985) (interpreting Weinberger as allowing for remedies other than appraisal when specii c acts of unfairness are alleged). 5. 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (2009). 6. 15 U.S.C. §§ 77(f), 77(g) (2009). 7. Id. §§ 78m(d), 78m(e), 78n(d), 78n(f). cox85509_22_c22_p499-536.indd 528 cox85509_22_c22_p499-......
  • Equitable Limits On Acquisitions And Defensive Maneuvers
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Corporate Counsel Guides: Corporation Law
    • July 3, 2012
    ...27. Bird v. Wirtz, 266 N.W.2d 166 (Minn. 1978); Berkowitz v. Power/Mate Corp., 342 A.2d 566 (N.J. Super. Ch. Ct. 1975). 28. 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (2009). 29. 15 U.S.C. § 78n(e) (2009). 30. 17 C.F.R. § 240.13e-4 (2009). 31. Id. § 240.13e-3. 32. 17 C.F.R. § 240.13e-3(a)(3) (2009). cox85509_23......
  • Get Started for Free