Duty to have fall protection

CurrencyCurrent through May 31, 2023
Citation 29 C.F.R. §1926.501
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 cases
  • Dir. v. Technologies
    • United States
    • Hawaii Court of Appeals
    • 31 Mayo 2011
    ...[Frank Montayre, Jr. (Montayre)] from fall hazards by providing him a functional personal fall arrest system and thereby complied with 29 C.F.R. § 1926.501" is clearly erroneous and Conclusion of Law (COL) 8 is wrong. (2) Permasteelisa did not plead or present any evidence of an affirmative......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT