21 C.F.R. §201.15 - Drugs; prominence of required label statements

Cite as21 C.F.R. §201.15
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Medinatura, Inc. v. Food & Drug Admin., Civil Action No. 20-2066 (RDM)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 23 Octubre 2020
    ...homeopathic products bear Latin names which correspond to listings in the 496 F.Supp.3d 439 HPUS. Since Section 502(c) of the Act and 21 CFR 201.15(c)(1) require that all labeling be in English, the industry is required to translate these names from Latin to their common English names as cu......
  • U.S. v. 1500 90-Tablet Bottles
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Northern District of Illinois)
    • 12 Agosto 2005
    ......and . all articles of drugs imported by Local Repack from Genendo ... of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 301 et seq (the "Act"). Defendant ... registered firms may repack and label drug products in compliance with the Act and ... with the Food and Drug Administration as required by the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. 21 U.S.C. § ......
  • United States v. Scully
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • 8 Junio 2015
    ...also argues that the affidavits improperly suggested that distributing non-English label drugs, a violation of an FDA regulation, 21 C.F.R. § 201.15(c)(1), gives rise to criminal liability.However, as noted later, the Court finds that a violation of this FDA regulation can serve in part as ......
  • Ramirez v. Plough, Inc., F015950
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 7 Octubre 1992
    ...in English and no other statute requires printing in another language. Federal regulations also require warnings be in English. (21 C.F.R. § 201.15 Respondent cites several cases including Guerrero v. Carleson (1973) 9 Cal.3d 808, 109 Cal.Rptr. 201, 512 P.2d 833 and Castro v. State of Calif......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT