29 CFR 541.504 - Drivers who sell

Cite as29 CFR 541.504
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
34 practice notes
  • Rehberg v. Flowers Baking Co. of Jamestown, LLC, DOCKET NO. 3:12-cv-00596-MOC-DSC
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Western District of North Carolina
    • February 12, 2016
    ...over most sales issues).In addition to the parties' arguments, the court has also considered the applicable factors outlined in 29 C.F.R. § 541.504(b) and finds that the record either does not contain sufficient information on the factors, the factors are inapplicable, or that they do not c......
  • Wirtz v. Keystone Readers Service, Inc., No. 26556.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • November 14, 1969
    ...managers. The court found that such promotional work was not exempted under the authority of the applicable department Bulletin. 29 C.F.R. § 541.504(a). The court also found that the Ben Franklin Reading Club was not an exempt "retail or service establishment" within the meaning of § 13(a) ......
  • Hurt v. Commerce Energy, Inc., No. 18-4058
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • August 31, 2020
    ...confirm this view. They say employees are covered if they "solicit[ ] orders" or engage in "solicitations." 29 C.F.R. §§ 541.503(a), 541.504(c)(2). Who else at Just Energy undertakes these acts of persuasion if not the plaintiffs? The plaintiffs certainly identify no one else.Consider some ......
  • Noll v. Flowers Foods Inc., 1:15-cv-00493-LEW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Court (Maine)
    • January 29, 2020
    ...a regulation devoted to "drivers who sell," but, frankly, the regulation raises as many questions as it answers. See 442 F.Supp.3d 356 29 C.F.R. § 541.504. Another regulation advises that the "determination of an employee's primary duty must be based on all the facts in a particular case, w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
34 cases
  • Rehberg v. Flowers Baking Co. of Jamestown, LLC, DOCKET NO. 3:12-cv-00596-MOC-DSC
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Western District of North Carolina
    • February 12, 2016
    ...over most sales issues).In addition to the parties' arguments, the court has also considered the applicable factors outlined in 29 C.F.R. § 541.504(b) and finds that the record either does not contain sufficient information on the factors, the factors are inapplicable, or that they do not c......
  • Wirtz v. Keystone Readers Service, Inc., No. 26556.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • November 14, 1969
    ...managers. The court found that such promotional work was not exempted under the authority of the applicable department Bulletin. 29 C.F.R. § 541.504(a). The court also found that the Ben Franklin Reading Club was not an exempt "retail or service establishment" within the meaning of § 13(a) ......
  • Hurt v. Commerce Energy, Inc., No. 18-4058
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • August 31, 2020
    ...confirm this view. They say employees are covered if they "solicit[ ] orders" or engage in "solicitations." 29 C.F.R. §§ 541.503(a), 541.504(c)(2). Who else at Just Energy undertakes these acts of persuasion if not the plaintiffs? The plaintiffs certainly identify no one else.Consider some ......
  • Noll v. Flowers Foods Inc., 1:15-cv-00493-LEW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Court (Maine)
    • January 29, 2020
    ...a regulation devoted to "drivers who sell," but, frankly, the regulation raises as many questions as it answers. See 442 F.Supp.3d 356 29 C.F.R. § 541.504. Another regulation advises that the "determination of an employee's primary duty must be based on all the facts in a particular case, w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT