37 C.F.R. § 1.19 - Document supply fees

Cite as37 C.F.R. § 1.19
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Patent cases: Patent business goals; implementation,
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 05, 1998
    • October 5, 1998
    ...application filing fee are submitted in a delayed manner; (2) issuing a corrected filing receipt without the fee presently required by 37 CFR 1.19(h), and without a question as to fault, for any error in the filing receipt; and (3) placing a copy of each filing receipt supplied to the appli......
  • Owners v. United States, No. 15-413C
    • United States
    • Court of Federal Claims
    • March 31, 2016
    ...402 F.3d 1167, 1173 (Fed. Cir. 2005). Plaintiffs also cite to various USPTO's fee regulations set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.16, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, 1.20, 1.445, 1.492 and 1.482. Pl. Supp. at 1; Pl. Resp. to Def. Supp. at 1. But, plaintiffs do not contend that the misapplication of these regulat......
  • Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees During Fiscal Year 2020
    • United States
    • Patent And Trademark Office
    • Invalid date
    ...Financial Transactions), select computer service fees were discontinued and the services made free. The three changes to the fees at 37 CFR 1.19 follow that trend. The service fees in Sec. 1.19 will be eliminated, and the Office will instead provide these services in a slightly modified for......
  • Patent and trademark cases: Fee revisions (2003 FY),
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 27, 2002
    • November 27, 2002
    ...times, regardless of whether a copy was ordered for regular or expedited delivery service. Therefore, we are eliminating the previous 37 CFR 1.19(a)(1)(ii), (a)(1)(iii), (b)(1)(i), 2.6(b)(1)(ii), (b)(1)(iii), and (b)(2)(i) fees and reducing the previous 37 CFR 1.19(b)(1)(ii) and 2.6(b)(2)(i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 cases
  • Owners v. United States, No. 15-413C
    • United States
    • Court of Federal Claims
    • March 31, 2016
    ...402 F.3d 1167, 1173 (Fed. Cir. 2005). Plaintiffs also cite to various USPTO's fee regulations set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.16, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, 1.20, 1.445, 1.492 and 1.482. Pl. Supp. at 1; Pl. Resp. to Def. Supp. at 1. But, plaintiffs do not contend that the misapplication of these regulat......
2 firm's commentaries
  • The Confused USPTO Policy on Certified Copies of Patent Applications
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • December 3, 2014
    ...of separate certified documents. If a sequence listing is too large to print out, USPTO rules require that the it be burned to CD (37 CFR 1.19(b)(3). MPEP § 1730). However, the PTO will not burn a CD containing both the sequence listing and the main body of the A further complication is tha......
  • The Confused USPTO Policy On Certified Copies Of Patent Applications
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • December 3, 2014
    ...of separate certified documents. If a sequence listing is too large to print out, USPTO rules require that the it be burned to CD (37 CFR 1.19(b)(3). MPEP § 1730). However, the PTO will not burn a CD containing both the sequence listing and the main body of the specification. A further comp......
1 forms
  • Request for Access to an Abandoned Application Under 37 CFR 1.14-SB/68
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • Invalid date
    ...payment of the appropriate fee. Such copies must be purchased through the Office of Public Records upon payment of the appropriate fee (37 CFR 1.19(b)). For published applications that are still pending, a member of the public may obtain a copy the file contents; the pending application as ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT