7 CFR 273.16 - Disqualification for intentional Program violation
| Cite as | 7 CFR 273.16 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
59 practice notes
-
Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
...under OMB No. 0584-0479. The information collection burden associated with provisions in this rule which affect the regulations at 7 CFR 273.16, the Demand Letter for Over Issuance, is approved under OMB 0584-0492. The information collection burden that is associated with the provisions in ......
-
Food stamp program: Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconcilation Act; implementation Personal responsibility provisions,
...No. 0584-0479. The information collection burden that is associated with proposed provisions in this rule which affect the regulations at 7 CFR 273.16, the Demand Letter for Over Issuance, is approved under OMB In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Food and Nutrition S......
-
Food Stamp Program:
Certification of eligible households,
...7 CFR 273.7; The State agency has determined that a household member has committed an intentional Program violation in accordance with 7 CFR 273.16, or the State agency is closing the household's TANF case in response to information indicating the household failed to comply with food stamp ......
-
Part III
...7 CFR 273.7; The State agency has determined that a household member has committed an intentional Program violation in accordance with 7 CFR 273.16, or the State agency is closing the household's TANF case in response to information indicating the household failed to comply with food stamp ......
Request a trial to view additional results
37 cases
-
Williams v. Berry, Civil Action No. 3:13CV38TSL–JMR.
...court described as “[t]he careful limitation on information disclosure throughout the regulatory structure, the qualified language of 7 C.F.R. § 273.16(e)(2), and the absence of any reference to providing case files to prosecuting authorities anywhere else in the regulatory structure....” R......
-
Ortiz v. Eichler, Civ. A. No. 84-16 MMS.
...additional rights, presumably because intentional program violators are subject to punitive measures. Compare 7 C.F.R. § 273.15 with 7 C.F.R. § 273.16. In Delaware, a DES caseworker makes the initial decision to deny an application for public assistance benefits or to reduce or terminate ex......
-
Gonzalez v. State, No. 416, 2018
...case at basically the value of the overissued benefits.78 If anything, this provision supports the argument for preemption.Nor does 7 C.F.R § 273.16(g)(1)(ii) suggest that the State can proceed against a SNAP beneficiary in both an administrative disqualification hearing and a civil action ......
-
Thomas v. North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources, No. COA95-1310
...by the Secretary of Agriculture pursuant to 7 U.S.C.A.2013(c) (1991), however, postpone the penalty period mandated by the statute. 7 C.F.R. 273.16(e)(8)(iii) (1992) provides that "[i]f the individual is not eligible for the Program at the time the disqualification period is to begin, the p......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Accused Poor.
...than the criminal context's "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard; here, "clear and convincing evidence" creates legal culpability [7 CFR 273.16(e)(6)]. There is also more legal leeway for welfare rule enforcement practices. Wyman v. James (1971) declared announced home visits by social work......