28 C.F.R. §42.104 - Discrimination prohibited
| Cite as | 28 C.F.R. §42.104 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
49 cases
-
Ass'n of Mexican-American Educators v. State of Cal., No. C-92-3874 WHO.
...15 C.F.R. § 8.4(b)(2) (1993) (Department of Commerce); 24 C.F.R. § 1.4(b)(2)(i) (1992) (Department of Housing and Urban Development); 28 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(2) (1992) (Department of Justice); 29 C.F.R. § 31.3(b)(2) (1992) (Department of Labor); 34 C.F.R. § 100.3(b)(2) (1992) (Department of T......
-
South Camden Citizens in Action v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Civil Action No. 01-702 (D. N.J. 5/10/2001), Civil Action No. 01-702
...of Transportation have promulgated implementing regulations to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, pursuant to § 602. See 28 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(2) (DOJ regulations) and 49 C.F.R. § 21.5(b)(2) (DOT regulations). These regulations prohibit recipients of federal funds from, inter alia, "......
-
Wilson v. Wilkinson, Case No. 2:04-CV-918.
...which have the effect of subjecting individuals to discrimination because of their race, color, or national origin ..." 28 C.F.R. § 42.104(b)(2) (2000). Plaintiff asks this Court to enforce the DOJ regulation under Section 1983. Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment at Plaintiffs Title VI ......
-
Farm Labor Organizing Comm. v. Ohio State Highway, No. 3:96CV7580.
...be protected by qualified immunity for the same reasons that deprive Trooper Kiefer of his claim of qualified immunity. 11. Further, 28 C.F.R. § 42.104(b), promulgated under Title VI, provides that a federally funded program or activity cannot provide any "disposition ... to an individual w......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
USDOJ Pursues Last-Minute Attempt to Kill “Adverse Impact” Discrimination Claims Against Federal Grant Recipients
...906; Larry P. v. Riles, 793 F.2d 969 (9th Cir. 1984). DOJ’s Proposed Amendment and Reasoning for Change The DOJ’s proposed amendments to 28 CFR Part 42 would preclude “disparate impact discrimination” claims as a potential source of liability against recipients of federal financial assistan......