37 C.F.R. 2.120 - Discovery

Cite as37 C.F.R. 2.120
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
281 practice notes
  • Rosenruist-Gestao E Servicos v. Virgin Enterprises, No. 06-1588.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • December 27, 2007
    ...through written questions, but it did not seek to conduct a discovery deposition prior to the expiration of the discovery period. See 37 C.F.R. § 2.120(a). In December 2005, VEL, pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, sought to conduct a testimonial deposition of......
  • Abbott Labs. v. Cordis Corp., No. 2012–1244.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • March 20, 2013
    ...are explicitly permitted in two other types of PTO proceedings, as well: trademark proceedings and disciplinary proceedings. See37 C.F.R. §§ 2.120(3)(b), (j)(2), 11.38. Both types of proceedings allow the use of depositions. See37 C.F.R. §§ 11.50–.51, 2.123–.124. Another type of proceeding,......
  • Yamaha Intern. Corp. v. Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd., No. 87-1128
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • March 7, 1988
    ...applicable and appropriate," Page 1576 37 C.F.R. Sec. 2.116(a), are used to govern discovery matters "except as otherwise provided," 37 C.F.R. Sec. 2.120, and are applied to evidentiary matters in conjunction with the Federal Rules of Evidence, 37 C.F.R. Sec. 2.122(a). The opposer in any op......
  • United States v. Aleo, Nos. 10–1569
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • May 15, 2012
    ...16(f), 26(g)(3), 37, 56(h); 18 U.S.C. § 401; 28 U.S.C. § 1927; see also8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(6) (immigration proceedings); 37 C.F.R. § 2.120(g) (trademark proceedings); Fed. R.App. P. 38 (appellate proceedings); Fed. R. Bankr.P. 9011 (bankruptcy proceedings). In the face of these carefully de......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
274 cases
  • Rosenruist-Gestao E Servicos v. Virgin Enterprises, No. 06-1588.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • December 27, 2007
    ...through written questions, but it did not seek to conduct a discovery deposition prior to the expiration of the discovery period. See 37 C.F.R. § 2.120(a). In December 2005, VEL, pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, sought to conduct a testimonial deposition of......
  • Abbott Labs. v. Cordis Corp., No. 2012–1244.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • March 20, 2013
    ...are explicitly permitted in two other types of PTO proceedings, as well: trademark proceedings and disciplinary proceedings. See37 C.F.R. §§ 2.120(3)(b), (j)(2), 11.38. Both types of proceedings allow the use of depositions. See37 C.F.R. §§ 11.50–.51, 2.123–.124. Another type of proceeding,......
  • United States v. Aleo, Nos. 10–1569
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • May 15, 2012
    ...16(f), 26(g)(3), 37, 56(h); 18 U.S.C. § 401; 28 U.S.C. § 1927; see also8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(6) (immigration proceedings); 37 C.F.R. § 2.120(g) (trademark proceedings); Fed. R.App. P. 38 (appellate proceedings); Fed. R. Bankr.P. 9011 (bankruptcy proceedings). In the face of these carefully de......
  • Yamaha Intern. Corp. v. Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd., No. 87-1128
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • March 7, 1988
    ...applicable and appropriate," Page 1576 37 C.F.R. Sec. 2.116(a), are used to govern discovery matters "except as otherwise provided," 37 C.F.R. Sec. 2.120, and are applied to evidentiary matters in conjunction with the Federal Rules of Evidence, 37 C.F.R. Sec. 2.122(a). The opposer in any op......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
  • After B&B Hardware, What is the Full Scope of Estoppel Arising From a PTAB Decision in District Court Litigation?
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 1, 2015
    ...135 S. Ct. at 1309. [14] See 15 U.S.C. § 1067; 35 U.S.C. § 6 (administrative judges); 37 C.F.R. Part 2 (trademark regulations); 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.120 and 2.122; 37 C.F.R. Part 42 (procedural rules); and 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.51 (discovery) and § 42.62 (Federal Rules of Evidence). [15] See 15 U.S.C. ......
  • MBHB Snippets: Review of Developments in Intellectual Property Law: Spring 2015 - Vol. 13, Issue 2
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 3, 2015
    ...Hardware, 135 S. Ct. at 1309. 14 See 15 U.S.C. § 1067; 35 U.S.C. § 6 (administrative judges); 37 C.F.R. Part 2 (trademark regulations); 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.120 and 2.122; 37 C.F.R. Part 42 (procedural rules); and 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.51 (discovery) and § 42.62 (Federal Rules of Evidence). 15 See 15 U......
  • Which Time Zone Controls the Timeliness of Discovery Requests at the TTAB?
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • July 26, 2021
    ...applicable Board Rules, parties must serve discovery requests in sufficient time to require responses before the close of discovery. 37 CFR § 2.120(a)(3). In this case, discovery closed on January 2, 2021. Because the answering party receives 30 days to respond to discovery requests, Island......
  • TTABlog Test: Are Cell Phone Covers Related To Sunglasses Under Section 2(d)?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • December 27, 2018
    ...documents produced in response to a Rule 34 request are not admissible by way of notice of reliance. Trademark Rule 2.120(k)(3)(ii), 37 C.F.R. § 2.120(k)(3)(ii) (A party that has obtained documents from another party through disclosure or under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedur......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Trademark/Trade Dress Prosecution
    • United States
    • New practitioner’s guide to intellectual property Trademarks, Trade Dress, Unfair Competition, and Trade Secrets
    • May 16, 2012
    ...circumstances, i.e., that the petitioner would be unduly prejudiced without an interference, in order for the Office to 83. 37 C.F.R. §2.120(i)(2). 84. TBMP §102.03. 85. TBMP §102.02. 86. 15 U.S.C. §10672(a); TBMP §303. 87. The America Invents Act (HR 1249), passed September 16, 2011, amend......
  • What You Need to Know: Major Changes to the TTAB Rules of Practice
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 9-4, March 2017
    • March 1, 2017
    ...Fed. Reg. at 69,966 8. Id. . 9. 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.105(a), .113(a). 10. Id. § 2.119(b). 11. Id. 12. 81 Fed. Reg. at 69,950, 69,959–60. 13. 37 C.F.R. § 2.120(f)(1). 14. Id. §§ 2.120(f)(1), (i)(1). 15. Id. § 2.127(e)(1). 16. Id. § 2.120(k)(2). 17. 81 Fed. Reg. at 69950-51, 69960. 18. Id. § 2.127(......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT