28 CFR 2.55 - Disclosure of file prior to parole hearing

Cite as:28 CFR 2.55
Currency:Current through December 7, 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      Read this document for free by creating your vLex Open account
    • FREE SIGN UP
27 practice notes
  • 538 F.Supp. 658 (M.D.Pa. 1982), Civ. 81-0160, DiNapoli v. United States Parole Com'n
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 3th Circuit Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • 21 Abril 1982
    ...initial hearing. However, that citation was in error and according to Nardoza, the proper authority for the action taken is found at 28 C.F.R. s 2.55(f) because no earlier decision had been On June 12, 1980, DiNapoli was afforded a new initial hearing. The examiner panel recommended that Di......
  • 606 F.Supp. 880 (D.D.C. 1985), Civ. A. 83-2703, White v. United States Dept. of Justice
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts District of Columbia
    • 10 Enero 1985
    ...the presentence report, to the Commission after being afforded "reasonable access" to them. See 18 U.S.C. § 4208(b); 28 C.F.R. §§ 2.55(a)(3), 2.56(a) (1984). Rather than there being no discretion to provide a copy of the presentence report as required of exempting statutes under F......
  • 707 F.2d 1060 (9th Cir. 1983), 82-4062, Williams v. United States Parole Com'n
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    • 8 Junio 1983
    ...received by the Commission after the initial decision to reopen since Williams eventually waived the defects in disclosure. See 28 C.F.R. Sec. 2.55(f) (1982); Ready v. United States Parole Commission, 483 F.Supp. 1273, 1277 (M.D.Pa.1980). Notes: [1] The legislative history makes clear that ......
  • 585 F.2d 922 (8th Cir. 1978), 78-1136, Williams v. Missouri Bd. of Probation and Parole
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
    • 27 Octubre 1978
    ...unwilling at this time to adopt it verbatim as a constitutional minimum, we do note with approval the federal regulations contained in 28 C.F.R. § 2.55. These regulations resolve the conflicting interests by providing that a prisoner is entitled to review reports and other documents in his ......
  • Free signup to view additional results
27 cases
  • 538 F.Supp. 658 (M.D.Pa. 1982), Civ. 81-0160, DiNapoli v. United States Parole Com'n
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 3th Circuit Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • 21 Abril 1982
    ...initial hearing. However, that citation was in error and according to Nardoza, the proper authority for the action taken is found at 28 C.F.R. s 2.55(f) because no earlier decision had been On June 12, 1980, DiNapoli was afforded a new initial hearing. The examiner panel recommended that Di......
  • 606 F.Supp. 880 (D.D.C. 1985), Civ. A. 83-2703, White v. United States Dept. of Justice
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts District of Columbia
    • 10 Enero 1985
    ...the presentence report, to the Commission after being afforded "reasonable access" to them. See 18 U.S.C. § 4208(b); 28 C.F.R. §§ 2.55(a)(3), 2.56(a) (1984). Rather than there being no discretion to provide a copy of the presentence report as required of exempting statutes under F......
  • 707 F.2d 1060 (9th Cir. 1983), 82-4062, Williams v. United States Parole Com'n
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    • 8 Junio 1983
    ...received by the Commission after the initial decision to reopen since Williams eventually waived the defects in disclosure. See 28 C.F.R. Sec. 2.55(f) (1982); Ready v. United States Parole Commission, 483 F.Supp. 1273, 1277 (M.D.Pa.1980). Notes: [1] The legislative history makes clear that ......
  • 585 F.2d 922 (8th Cir. 1978), 78-1136, Williams v. Missouri Bd. of Probation and Parole
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
    • 27 Octubre 1978
    ...unwilling at this time to adopt it verbatim as a constitutional minimum, we do note with approval the federal regulations contained in 28 C.F.R. § 2.55. These regulations resolve the conflicting interests by providing that a prisoner is entitled to review reports and other documents in his ......
  • Free signup to view additional results