37 CFR 11.2 - Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline

Cite as37 CFR 11.2
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Cornish v. Dudas ., Civil Action No. 07-1719 (RWR).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • June 4, 2010
    ...petition from any action or requirement of the staff of OED reporting to the OED Director shall be taken to the OED Director[.]” 37 C.F.R. § 11.2(c). A “petition not filed within sixty days from the mailing date of the action or notice from which relief is requested will be dismissed as unt......
  • Practice and procedure: Representation of others before United States Patent and Trademark Office; changes,
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 28, 2007
    • February 28, 2007
    ...Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr28fe07-16] [[Page 9195]] Part III Department of Commerce Patent and Trademark Office 37 CFR Part 11 Changes to Representation of Others Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Proposed Rule [[Page 9196]] DEPARTMENT OF COMMER......
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 28, 2007
    • February 28, 2007
    ...Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr28fe07-16] [[Page 9195]] Part III Department of Commerce Patent and Trademark Office 37 CFR Part 11 Changes to Representation of Others Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Proposed Rule [[Page 9196]] DEPARTMENT OF COMMER......
  • Peer Bearing Co. v. Roller Bearing Co. of Am., MISCELLANIOUS CASE NO. 12-216
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • December 19, 2012
    ...determinations. Id. § 11.19(c). Petitions directly to the USPTO Director under Part 11 are expressly authorized by subpart A, 37 C.F.R. § 11.2(e), which states that "[p]etition may be taken to the USPTO Director to invoke the supervisory authority of the USPTO Director in appropriate circum......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • Cornish v. Dudas ., Civil Action No. 07-1719 (RWR).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • June 4, 2010
    ...petition from any action or requirement of the staff of OED reporting to the OED Director shall be taken to the OED Director[.]” 37 C.F.R. § 11.2(c). A “petition not filed within sixty days from the mailing date of the action or notice from which relief is requested will be dismissed as unt......
  • Peer Bearing Co. v. Roller Bearing Co. of Am., MISCELLANIOUS CASE NO. 12-216
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • December 19, 2012
    ...determinations. Id. § 11.19(c). Petitions directly to the USPTO Director under Part 11 are expressly authorized by subpart A, 37 C.F.R. § 11.2(e), which states that "[p]etition may be taken to the USPTO Director to invoke the supervisory authority of the USPTO Director in appropriate circum......
  • Swyers v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, Civil No. 1:16-cv-15
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Virginia)
    • May 27, 2016
    ...Congress intended to preclude judicial review." Nat'l Taxpayers Union, 376 F.3d at 243 n.2. 11. This is, of course, not accurate as 37 C.F.R. § 11.2(e) provides a specific mechanism to challenge "any action or notice of any employee of the [OED] during or at the conclusion of a disciplinary......
  • Matter of Discipline of Peirce, No. 45553.
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court of Nevada
    • February 9, 2006
    ...Notes: 1. The Director appears to serve much the same purpose and carry substantially similar duties as bar counsel. Compare 37 C.F.R. § 11.2 (2005), with SCR 2. See People v. Bode, 119 P.3d 1098 (Colo. O.P.D.J.2005); Matter of Slater, 156 A.D.2d 89, 554 N.Y.S.2d 11 (1990); Office of Discip......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT