19 CFR 111.29 - Diligence in correspondence and paying monies
| Cite as | 19 CFR 111.29 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 practice notes
-
U.S. v. Federal Ins. Co., No. 85-2343
...directly to the United States rather than to the broker, and that payment to the broker does not relieve the importer of liability. 19 C.F.R. Sec. 111.29(b)(1). This change reinforces the view that the prior regulations and practices were notably imperfect. The trial court's decision is not......
-
Lee v. U.S., SLIP.OP. 02-33.
...their assessment. Mr. Lee's failures to make timely payment themselves constituted new breaches of Customs regulations—specifically, 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.29 and 111.94.1 Invoking 19 C.F.R. § 111.53,2 Customs sought revocation of Mr. Lee's license based on the new charges. The specific facts und......
-
United States v. Robert E. Landweer & Co., Slip Op. 12–17.Court No. 09–00060.
...alleged that Landweer, a customs broker, violated 19 U.S.C. § 1641(b)(4) and 19 C.F.R. § 111.28(a) as well as 19 U.S.C. § 1641(d) and 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.29 and 143.6, and was liable to the United States for a penalty in the amount of $30,000 pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1641(d)(1)(C) and (d)(2)(A)......
-
United States v. Santos
...entries in question, in violation of 19 C.F.R. §§ 152.11 and 141.90.7IV. Count IV Count IV alleges that Santos violated 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.28, 111.29, 141.90, 142.6, and 152.11. Compl. ¶¶ 35–42. These allegations relate to entry BTN–00052032, which Santos entered as “U.S. goods returned”; how......
Request a trial to view additional results
25 cases
-
U.S. v. Federal Ins. Co., No. 85-2343
...directly to the United States rather than to the broker, and that payment to the broker does not relieve the importer of liability. 19 C.F.R. Sec. 111.29(b)(1). This change reinforces the view that the prior regulations and practices were notably imperfect. The trial court's decision is not......
-
Lee v. U.S., SLIP.OP. 02-33.
...their assessment. Mr. Lee's failures to make timely payment themselves constituted new breaches of Customs regulations—specifically, 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.29 and 111.94.1 Invoking 19 C.F.R. § 111.53,2 Customs sought revocation of Mr. Lee's license based on the new charges. The specific facts und......
-
United States v. Robert E. Landweer & Co., Slip Op. 12–17.Court No. 09–00060.
...alleged that Landweer, a customs broker, violated 19 U.S.C. § 1641(b)(4) and 19 C.F.R. § 111.28(a) as well as 19 U.S.C. § 1641(d) and 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.29 and 143.6, and was liable to the United States for a penalty in the amount of $30,000 pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1641(d)(1)(C) and (d)(2)(A)......
-
United States v. Santos
...entries in question, in violation of 19 C.F.R. §§ 152.11 and 141.90.7IV. Count IV Count IV alleges that Santos violated 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.28, 111.29, 141.90, 142.6, and 152.11. Compl. ¶¶ 35–42. These allegations relate to entry BTN–00052032, which Santos entered as “U.S. goods returned”; how......
Request a trial to view additional results