6 CFR 27.205 - Determination that a chemical facility ''presents a high level of security risk.''

Cite as6 CFR 27.205
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Chemical facility anti-terrorism standards,
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 28, 2006
    • December 28, 2006
    ...Plan. To do so, a chemical facility must file an objection according to the procedures specified in the pertinent section--either 6 CFR 27.205(c) ``Determination that a Chemical Facility Presents a High Level of Security Risk--Objection,'' 6 CFR 27.220(b) ``Tiering--Objection,'' or 6 CFR 27......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 28, 2006
    • December 28, 2006
    ...Plan. To do so, a chemical facility must file an objection according to the procedures specified in the pertinent section--either 6 CFR 27.205(c) ``Determination that a Chemical Facility Presents a High Level of Security Risk--Objection,'' 6 CFR 27.220(b) ``Tiering--Objection,'' or 6 CFR 27......
  • Greenpeace, Inc. v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., Civil Action No. 17–479 (TJK)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • May 1, 2018
    ...facility could result in significant adverse consequences for human life or health, national security or critical economic assets." 6 C.F.R. § 27.205(a). The first step in making this determination is to identify which chemical facilities possess a "screening threshold quantity," or "STQ," ......
  • Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards
    • United States
    • Federal Register July 20, 2016
    • July 20, 2016
    ...covered chemical facilities to submit their initial SVA within 120 days of written notification of the Department's determination under 6 CFR 27.205(a) that they are under 6 CFR 27.210(a)(3), when the Department transitions to CSAT 2.0, to require covered chemical facilities to submit their......
1 cases
  • Greenpeace, Inc. v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., Civil Action No. 17–479 (TJK)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • May 1, 2018
    ...facility could result in significant adverse consequences for human life or health, national security or critical economic assets." 6 C.F.R. § 27.205(a). The first step in making this determination is to identify which chemical facilities possess a "screening threshold quantity," or "STQ," ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT