47 CFR 52.31 - Deployment of long-term database methods for number portability by CMRS providers
| Cite as | 47 CFR 52.31 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Cellular Telecommunications & Internet v. F.C.C., No. 02-1264.
...First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule, 11 F.C.C.R. 8352, 1996 WL 400225 (1996) ("First Report and Order"); 47 C.F.R. § 52.31. In 1999, the Commission granted a request from petitioner Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association ("CTIA"), pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 1......
-
U.S. Telecom Ass'n v. F.C.C., No. 03-1414.
...to wireless providers, and vice versa. First Order ¶ 152, 11 F.C.C.R. at 8431, ¶ 155, at 8433, ¶ 166, at 8440; see 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.23(b), 52.31(a).1 Although the First Order mandated service provider portability, it expressly declined to require "location portability," which it defined as "......
-
In re Applications of Western Wireless Corp., WT 05-50
...[175] Wireless LNP was required in the 100 largest markets as of November 24, 2003, and required nationwide on May 24, 2004. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.31; see also Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, First Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd 7236, 7314 (1997......
-
Pendergast v. Sprint Nextel Corp., No. 09-10612.
...Ts&Cs." 10. Since 2003, Federal Communications Commission rules have required phone number portability between mobile phone providers. 47 C.F.R. § 52.31. 11. This Court reviews the district court's grant of Sprint's motion to compel arbitration de novo. Dale v. Comcast Corp., 498 F.3d 1216,......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Cellular Telecommunications & Internet v. F.C.C., No. 02-1264.
...First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule, 11 F.C.C.R. 8352, 1996 WL 400225 (1996) ("First Report and Order"); 47 C.F.R. § 52.31. In 1999, the Commission granted a request from petitioner Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association ("CTIA"), pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 1......
-
U.S. Telecom Ass'n v. F.C.C., No. 03-1414.
...to wireless providers, and vice versa. First Order ¶ 152, 11 F.C.C.R. at 8431, ¶ 155, at 8433, ¶ 166, at 8440; see 47 C.F.R. §§ 52.23(b), 52.31(a).1 Although the First Order mandated service provider portability, it expressly declined to require "location portability," which it defined as "......
-
In re Applications of Western Wireless Corp., WT 05-50
...[175] Wireless LNP was required in the 100 largest markets as of November 24, 2003, and required nationwide on May 24, 2004. See 47 C.F.R. § 52.31; see also Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, First Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd 7236, 7314 (1997......
-
Pendergast v. Sprint Nextel Corp., No. 09-10612.
...Ts&Cs." 10. Since 2003, Federal Communications Commission rules have required phone number portability between mobile phone providers. 47 C.F.R. § 52.31. 11. This Court reviews the district court's grant of Sprint's motion to compel arbitration de novo. Dale v. Comcast Corp., 498 F.3d 1216,......
Request a trial to view additional results