8 CFR 103.3 - Denials, appeals, and precedent decisions

Cite as8 CFR 103.3
CurrencyCurrent through December 31, 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
199 practice notes
  • Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers of Inadmissibility for Certain Immediate Relatives
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 02, 2012
    • 2 avril 2012
    ...and his or her attorney or accredited representative and will advise the applicant of appeal procedures, if any, in accordance with 8 CFR 103.3. The denial of a provisional unlawful presence waiver is governed by 8 CFR (4) Validity. (i) A provisional unlawful presence waiver granted accordi......
  • Adjustment of Status to Lawful Permanent Resident for Aliens in T or U Nonimmigrant Status
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 12, 2008
    • 10 février 2009
    ...denial and of the right to appeal the decision to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) pursuant to the AAO appeal procedures found at 8 CFR 103.3. Denial of the T-1 principal applicant's application will result in the automatic denial of a derivative family member's (j) Effect of Departu......
  • 622 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir. 1980), 78-1243, Wang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    • 4 juin 1980
    ...that matter any decision, should contain a discussion of the evidence and the reasons for granting or denying the alien's request. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 103.3, 242.18(a) (1979). Only by knowing the basis for the Board's decision can we adequately review it. Insofar as Perales v. INS, 575 F.2d 129......
  • 694 F.Supp. 864 (S.D.Fla. 1988), 88-1066, Haitian Refugee Center, Inc. v. Nelson
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 11th Circuit Southern District of Florida
    • 22 août 1988
    ...comply with the following: (1) In those case in which the INS issued notices of denial which did not comply with the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a) because they did not advise the applicant of the correct procedure for appeal or did not provide specific reasons for denial, the INS shal......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
168 cases
  • 622 F.2d 1341 (9th Cir. 1980), 78-1243, Wang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    • 4 juin 1980
    ...that matter any decision, should contain a discussion of the evidence and the reasons for granting or denying the alien's request. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 103.3, 242.18(a) (1979). Only by knowing the basis for the Board's decision can we adequately review it. Insofar as Perales v. INS, 575 F.2d 129......
  • 694 F.Supp. 864 (S.D.Fla. 1988), 88-1066, Haitian Refugee Center, Inc. v. Nelson
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 11th Circuit Southern District of Florida
    • 22 août 1988
    ...comply with the following: (1) In those case in which the INS issued notices of denial which did not comply with the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a) because they did not advise the applicant of the correct procedure for appeal or did not provide specific reasons for denial, the INS shal......
  • 814 F.Supp.2d 1098 (W.D.Wash. 2011), C09-1269 RSM, Rahman v. Napolitano
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 9th Circuit Western District of Washington
    • 9 décembre 2011
    ...[AAO] is the appellate body which considers cases under the appellate jurisdiction of the Associate Commissioner, Examinations." 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(iv). " Decisions under the appellate jurisdiction of the Associate Commissioner, Examinations, are listed in § 103.1(f)[ (3) ] of......
  • 971 F.2d 510 (10th Cir. 1992), 90-1023, Marczak v. Greene
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
    • 23 juillet 1992
    ...whether exclusion is appropriate. That decision may be appealed, first to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), 8 U.S.C. § 1226(b); 8 C.F.R. §§ 103.3, 236.7, and then to the Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the administrative proceedings were held, 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(2). Pending......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • Coming to America: how restrictive and arbitrary immigration laws burden the artistic community.
    • United States
    • Faulkner Law Review Vol. 4 Nbr. 1, September 2012
    • 22 septembre 2012
    ...Painter Case, supra note 100, at *8. (130) Id. (131) Id. (132) AnnaBoch.com,http://www.annaboch.com/the-red-vineyard-htm. (133) Id. (134) 8 C.F.R. 103.3 (2011). (135) Nassi, supra note 1, at 129. (136) Kimberly S. Miloch, Coming to America: Immigration and the Professional Athlete, 13 J. LE......
29 provisions