24 C.F.R. 982.553 - Denial of admission and termination of assistance for criminals and alcohol abusers

Cite as24 C.F.R. 982.553
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
88 practice notes
  • Bey ex rel. Graves v. Richmond Redevelopment & Hous. Auth., Action No. 3:13CV464-HEH
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Virginia)
    • August 8, 2013
    ...It appears that Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged a violation of his procedural due process rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1437d and 24 C.F.R. § 982.553. Thus, the Court will allow Plaintiff to proceed on that claim, but without prejudicing Defendants' right to move for dismissal on alternative ......
  • Powell v. Housing Authority of Pittsburgh
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • December 20, 2002
    ...of the Regulations stated that the Authority could terminate assistance if any family member engaged in violent criminal activity. 24 C.F.R. § 982.553(a)(2) On August 25, 1998, Appellee's two teenage sons carjacked a vehicle in the parking lot of a supermarket located just under a mile from......
  • Long v. D.C. Hous. Auth., Civil Action No.: 15-00605 (RC)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • February 29, 2016
    ...requirement in the State where the housing is located and in other States where the household members are known to have resided.24 C.F.R. § 982.553(a)(2)(i) (emphasis in original). The subsection that follows, § 982.553(b), titled “Terminating assistance,” requires PHAs to establish standar......
  • Shannon v. Comm'r of Hous., No. 19562.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • August 2, 2016
    ...statutes and regulations governing the section 8 program; see 42 U.S.C. §§ 13663(a) and 13664(a)(2)(B) ; 24 C.F.R. §§ 982.552(b) and 982.553(a)(2)(i) ; the defendant argues that the text and legislative history of the state regulations supports an interpretation that allows for termination ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
77 cases
  • Bey ex rel. Graves v. Richmond Redevelopment & Hous. Auth., Action No. 3:13CV464-HEH
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Virginia)
    • August 8, 2013
    ...It appears that Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged a violation of his procedural due process rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1437d and 24 C.F.R. § 982.553. Thus, the Court will allow Plaintiff to proceed on that claim, but without prejudicing Defendants' right to move for dismissal on alternative ......
  • Powell v. Housing Authority of Pittsburgh
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • December 20, 2002
    ...of the Regulations stated that the Authority could terminate assistance if any family member engaged in violent criminal activity. 24 C.F.R. § 982.553(a)(2) On August 25, 1998, Appellee's two teenage sons carjacked a vehicle in the parking lot of a supermarket located just under a mile from......
  • Long v. D.C. Hous. Auth., Civil Action No.: 15-00605 (RC)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • February 29, 2016
    ...requirement in the State where the housing is located and in other States where the household members are known to have resided.24 C.F.R. § 982.553(a)(2)(i) (emphasis in original). The subsection that follows, § 982.553(b), titled “Terminating assistance,” requires PHAs to establish standar......
  • Shannon v. Comm'r of Hous., No. 19562.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • August 2, 2016
    ...statutes and regulations governing the section 8 program; see 42 U.S.C. §§ 13663(a) and 13664(a)(2)(B) ; 24 C.F.R. §§ 982.552(b) and 982.553(a)(2)(i) ; the defendant argues that the text and legislative history of the state regulations supports an interpretation that allows for termination ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
3 books & journal articles
  • Disparate impact lacks an impact: the need for Pay for Success programs to house formerly incarcerated people.
    • United States
    • Fordham Urban Law Journal Vol. 44 Nbr. 2, May 2017
    • May 1, 2017
    ...has the discretion to admit the applicant."). (125.) See 42 U.S.C. [section] 13661(c) (2012); 24 C.F.R. [section] 5.100 (2012); 24 CFR 982.553 (2012); Pub. Hous. Guidebook, supra note 124; see also Geiger, supra note 78, at 1204 (explaining that PHAs and project owners may reject appli......
  • SC Lawyer, July 2007, #5. Public Interest Issues for the Private Practitioner.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Bar Journal Nbr. 2007, January 2007
    • January 1, 2007
    ...termination or eviction for violation of these provisions. 24 C.F.R. § 982.310(c) (discussing owner termination of lease) (2006); 24 C.F.R. § 982.553(b) (discussing PHA termination of lease) (2006). Under the Section 8 Project-Based Housing Program, the same criminal activities are grounds ......
  • SORNA - basic history and provisions.
    • United States
    • Prosecutor, Journal of the National District Attorneys Association Vol. 44 Nbr. 3, July 2010
    • July 1, 2010
    ...18, 2009). (15) Id. at 1076. (16) 42 U.S.C. [section]13663(a).This statute has not been amended to conform with SORNA's language. (17) 24 C.F.R. 982.553(a)(2)(1). (18) Miller v. McCormick, 605 F.Supp.2d 296 (D. Me. (19) 42 U.S.C. [section]16911(7) (20) 8 U.S.C. [section]1154(a)(viii). (21) ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT