18 C.F.R. §385.102 - Definitions (Rule 102)
| Cite as | 18 C.F.R. §385.102 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. City of Seattle
...as FERC granted the Tribe's motion to intervene in the proceedings. See FERC Order, 71 FERC ¶ 61159, at 61528–29 ; see also 18 C.F.R. § 385.102(c) ("Party means, with respect to a proceeding: ... Any person whose intervention in a proceeding is effective under Rule 214[, 18 C.F.R. § 385.214......
-
Nat'l Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n
...that only a "party" to Commission proceedings may seek administrative or judicial review of the Commission's final orders); 18 C.F.R. § 385.102(c) (defining "party" as "[a]ny respondent to a proceeding" or "[a] person whose intervention in a proceeding is effective under Rule 214").4 Sectio......
-
National Parks Conservation Association v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 19-72915
...that only a "party" to Commission proceedings may seek administrative or judicial review of the Commission's final orders); 18 C.F.R. § 385.102(c) (defining "party" as "[a]ny respondent to a proceeding" or "[a] person whose intervention in a proceeding is effective under Rule 214").[4] Sect......
-
Tribe v. City of Seattle
...as FERC granted the Tribe's motion to intervene in the proceedings. See FERC Order, 71 FERC ¶ 61159, at 61528-29; see also 18 C.F.R. § 385.102(c) ("Party means, with respect to a proceeding: . . . Any person whose intervention in a proceeding is effective under Rule 214[, 18 C.F.R. § 385.21......
Request a trial to view additional results