40 CFR 125.2 - Definitions

Cite as40 CFR 125.2
CurrencyCurrent through December 7, 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • 863 F.2d 1420 (9th Cir. 1988), 86-7390, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States E.P.A.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    • December 5, 1988
    ...regulations, however, do not require EPA to identify and regulate specific toxic pollutants in setting BAT effluent limitations. See 40 C.F.R. Sec. 125.2(d)(3) (1987). Previous limitations that regulated a characteristic of a waste stream without identifying specific pollutants have been up......
  • 426 U.S. 200 (1976), 74-1435, Environmental Protection Agency v. California ex rel.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Supreme Court
    • June 7, 1976
    ...and that the EPA Page 227 was authorized to, and would, continue to issue permits to federal dischargers were soon made explicit in 40 CFR §§ 125.2(a)(2), (b) (1975),41 which provide that federal dischargers are to comply with the EPA permit program, and that state NPDES permit programs do ......
  • 543 F.2d 521 (3rd Cir. 1976), 75-2124, American Iron and Steel Institute v. E.P.A.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    • October 5, 1976
    ...Net-Gross Regulations do no more than prescribe the policy and procedures to be followed in connection with applications for permits. 40 C.F.R. § 125.2(a)(1). Referring to the Act's definition of effluent limitation as meaning "any restriction established by a State or the Administrato......
  • 511 F.2d 963 (9th Cir. 1975), 73--2466, People of State of Cal. ex rel. State Water Resources Control Bd. v. E.P.A.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    • February 13, 1975
    ...the Act provides for state regulation of federal as well as state dischargers, is correct. Hence we declare invalid those portions of 40 C.F.R. 125.2(b) that exclude federal facilities discharging pollutants into navigable waters from compliance with any state permit program operating under......
4 cases
  • 863 F.2d 1420 (9th Cir. 1988), 86-7390, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States E.P.A.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    • December 5, 1988
    ...regulations, however, do not require EPA to identify and regulate specific toxic pollutants in setting BAT effluent limitations. See 40 C.F.R. Sec. 125.2(d)(3) (1987). Previous limitations that regulated a characteristic of a waste stream without identifying specific pollutants have been up......
  • 426 U.S. 200 (1976), 74-1435, Environmental Protection Agency v. California ex rel.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Supreme Court
    • June 7, 1976
    ...and that the EPA Page 227 was authorized to, and would, continue to issue permits to federal dischargers were soon made explicit in 40 CFR §§ 125.2(a)(2), (b) (1975),41 which provide that federal dischargers are to comply with the EPA permit program, and that state NPDES permit programs do ......
  • 543 F.2d 521 (3rd Cir. 1976), 75-2124, American Iron and Steel Institute v. E.P.A.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    • October 5, 1976
    ...Net-Gross Regulations do no more than prescribe the policy and procedures to be followed in connection with applications for permits. 40 C.F.R. § 125.2(a)(1). Referring to the Act's definition of effluent limitation as meaning "any restriction established by a State or the Administrato......
  • 511 F.2d 963 (9th Cir. 1975), 73--2466, People of State of Cal. ex rel. State Water Resources Control Bd. v. E.P.A.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    • February 13, 1975
    ...the Act provides for state regulation of federal as well as state dischargers, is correct. Hence we declare invalid those portions of 40 C.F.R. 125.2(b) that exclude federal facilities discharging pollutants into navigable waters from compliance with any state permit program operating under......