40 CFR 93.101 - Definitions

Cite as40 CFR 93.101
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
168 practice notes
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 14, 2007
    • February 14, 2007
    ...with the EPA, the FHWA and the FTA have changed this definition to be consistent with the EPA's transportation conformity rule (40 CFR 93.101). Several of the State DOTs, many transit agencies, and a few of the national advocacy organizations and MPOs and COGs commented that the word ``over......
  • Planning assistance and standards: Statewide and metropolitan transportation planning,
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 14, 2007
    • February 14, 2007
    ...with the EPA, the FHWA and the FTA have changed this definition to be consistent with the EPA's transportation conformity rule (40 CFR 93.101). Several of the State DOTs, many transit agencies, and a few of the national advocacy organizations and MPOs and COGs commented that the word ``over......
  • Transit Administration,
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 25, 2000
    • May 25, 2000
    ...and ``transportation control measure'' would be added and would have the meaning given it in the EPA conformity regulation provided at 40 CFR 93.101, as The term ``lapse'' means that the conformity determination for a transportation plan or TIP has expired, and thus there is no currently co......
  • Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards: State Implementation Plan Requirements
    • United States
    • Federal Register August 24, 2016
    • August 24, 2016
    ...rule; it merely explains what is already required. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \121\ 40 CFR 93.101. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Geographic Coverage of Emission Sources for a. Summary of Propos......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
  • Sierra Club v. Atlanta Regional Com'n, No. CIV.A.1:01-CV0428BBM.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • June 15, 2001
    ...certain date for the purposes of meeting further progress milestones or demonstrating attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS." See 40 C.F.R. § 93.101. 5. Under both the 1977 and the 1990 amendments, reasonable further progress denotes the annual incremental reductions in emissions that......
  • Sierra Club v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Action No. 05-1724 (JAP).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • September 28, 2006
    ...all principal arterial highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer an alternative to regional highway travel." 40 C.F.R. § 93.101; 40 C.F.R. § 93.100. Conversely, under the general conformity rules, a "[r]egionally significant action means a Federal action for wh......
  • City of South Pasadena v. Slater, No. CV98-6996DDP(MANx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • July 19, 1999
    ...issued. The regulations define "design concept" as "the type of facility identified by the project, e.g., freeway." 40 C.F.R. § 93.101. The regulations define "design scope" as "the design aspects which will affect the proposed facility's impact on regiona......
  • Sierra Club v. Atlanta Regional Com'n, No. CIV.A. 101CV0428BBM.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • January 18, 2002
    ...or approved control strategy implementation plan revision ... allocated to highway and transit vehicle use and emissions." 40 C.F.R. § 93.101. According to the EPA, "[a] SIP cannot effectively demonstrate attainment unless it identifies the level of motor vehicle emissions that ca......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The State Implementation Plan Process
    • United States
    • Air pollution control and climate change mitigation law
    • August 18, 2010
    ...that new photochemical grid modeling is not required when a MVEB in a submitted SIP 353. Id . §7511a(c)(2)(B), CAA §182(c)(2)(B). 354. 40 C.F.R. §93.101. 355. Id . §93.118(e)(4). S ee also Sierra Club v. EPA, 129 F.3d 137, 138, 28 ELR 20269 (D.C. Cir. 1997). 356. 265 F.3d 216 (4th Cir. 2001......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT