33 CFR 155.1020 - Definitions
| Cite as | 33 CFR 155.1020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Nontank Vessel Response Plans and Other Response Plan Requirements
...``Planholder'' is a term used by the maritime industry in common parlance to refer the vessel ``owner'' or ``operator'' (as defined in 33 CFR 155.1020) responsible for submitting and maintaining a Vessel Response Plan on file with the Coast Inactive Vessel The Coast Guard received one comme......
-
Part III
...extend beyond the territorial seas and to the outer boundary of the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). See definition of COTP zone found in 33 CFR 155.1020. For purposes of nontank vessel response plan (NTVRP) regulations, our territorial seas extend out 12 nautical miles (nm) from the baseline......
-
Part IV
...requirements are a part of the tank VRP regulations. They feel the existing definition of ``contract or other approved means'' (found in 33 CFR 155.1020) has worked well and should be applied throughout the regulations. The Coast Guard disagrees. The definition found in 33 CFR 155.1020 is w......
-
State v. Kirvin, 97-3266
...Guard regulations explaining that Exclusive Economic Zone extends 200 miles from territorial sea baseline) with 33 C.F.R. §§ 154.1020, 155.1020 (Coast Guard regulations explaining that Exclusive Economic Zone extends 200 nautical miles from territorial sea baseline) and 50 C.F.R. § 600.10 (......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
-
State v. Kirvin, No. 97-3266
...Guard regulations explaining that Exclusive Economic Zone extends 200 miles from territorial sea baseline) with 33 C.F.R. §§ 154.1020, 155.1020 (Coast Guard regulations explaining that Exclusive Economic Zone extends 200 nautical miles from territorial sea baseline) and 50 C.F.R. § 600.10 (......
-
Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. Water Quality Ins. Syndicate, 15 Civ. 2365 (PAE)
...definition the Coast Guard has adopted in its regulations under OPA governing tank-vessel response plans for oil. 320 F.Supp.3d 569See 33 C.F.R. § 155.1020. There, the Coast Guard has defined a "substantial threat of discharge" to include "any incident involving a vessel that may create a s......
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Coast Guard Authorization Act Of 2010
...Requires the Coast Guard to initiate a rulemaking before mid-October 2011 to modify the definition of "higher volume port area" in 33 C.F.R. §155.1020 and to replace "Port Angeles, WA" with "Cape Flattery, WA", which will expand the reach of various federal oil spill response provisions in ......