30 CFR 56.6000 - Definitions

Cite as30 CFR 56.6000
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 13, 2007
    • 13 April 2007
    ...of explosives at mining facilities subject to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. Its relevant regulations can be found at 30 CFR 56.6000 to 56.6905, 57.6000 to 57.6960, 75.1300 to 75.1328, and 77.1300 to 77.1304. The United States Department of Transportation (DOT), under the H......
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part III Labor Department, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 13, 2007
    • 13 April 2007
    ...of explosives at mining facilities subject to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977. Its relevant regulations can be found at 30 CFR 56.6000 to 56.6905, 57.6000 to 57.6960, 75.1300 to 75.1328, and 77.1300 to 77.1304. The United States Department of Transportation (DOT), under the H......
  • Rock of Ages Corp. v. Secretary of Labor, No. 98-4095
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 3 March 1999
    ...in these inspections. Some of the test blasts were unsuccessful, leaving undetonated pyrodex in the lift holes ("misfires"). See 30 C.F.R. § 56.6000 ("Misfire [means] [t]he complete or partial failure of explosive material to detonate as planned."). Following the tests in 1986 and 1987, ROA......
  • Explosives
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 03, 2010
    • 3 February 2010
    ...is responsible for regulating the transportation, storage, and use of explosives at mining facilities. Its relevant standards are 30 CFR 56.6000 to 56.6905, 57.6000 to 57.6960, 75.1300 to 75.1328, and 77.1300 to 77.1304. Mining-related standards issued by the Department of Interior's Office......
1 cases
  • Rock of Ages Corp. v. Secretary of Labor, 98-4095
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 3 March 1999
    ...in these inspections. Some of the test blasts were unsuccessful, leaving undetonated pyrodex in the lift holes ("misfires"). See 30 C.F.R. § 56.6000 ("Misfire [means] [t]he complete or partial failure of explosive material to detonate as planned."). Following the tests in 1986 and 1987, ROA......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT