29 CFR 1910.2 - Definitions

Cite as29 CFR 1910.2
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 practice notes
  • Deepwater ports: Regulations; revision,
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 29, 2006
    • September 29, 2006
    ...with 46 CFR 108.405 or (2) Is designed and installed in compliance with a national consensus standard, as that term is defined in 29 CFR 1910.2, for fire detection and fire alarm systems, and that complies with standards set by a nationally recognized testing laboratory, as that term is def......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 06, 2004
    • January 6, 2004
    ...comply with 46 CFR 108.405 or be designed and installed in compliance with a national consensus standard, as that term is defined in 29 CFR 1910.2, for fire-detection and fire alarm systems, and that complies with standards set by a nationally recognized testing laboratory, as that term is ......
  • Deepwater ports: Regulations; revision,
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 06, 2004
    • January 6, 2004
    ...comply with 46 CFR 108.405 or be designed and installed in compliance with a national consensus standard, as that term is defined in 29 CFR 1910.2, for fire-detection and fire alarm systems, and that complies with standards set by a nationally recognized testing laboratory, as that term is ......
  • Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution; Electrical Protective Equipment
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 11, 2014
    • April 11, 2014
    ...that procedures used to adopt standards conform to the procedures described in the definition of ``national consensus standard'' in 29 CFR 1910.2(g). See, for example, OSHA's adoption of national consensus standards and established Federal standards under Section 6(a) of the OSH Act (36 FR ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
  • Umansky v. Abc Ins. Co., No. 2007AP385.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
    • June 26, 2008
    ...of "employer." Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Pub.L. No. 91-596, §3(5), 84 Stat. 1590, 1591 (1970); 29 C.F.R. § 1910.2(c). However, WIS. ADMIN. CODE § Comm 32.15 provides, with certain exceptions not applicable here, that "all places of employment and public bu......
  • Umansky v. Abc Ins. Co., No. 2007AP385.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • June 17, 2009
    ...of "employer." Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Pub.L. No. 91-596, § 3(5), 84 Stat. 1590, 1591 (1970); 29 C.F.R. § 1910.2(c). However, Wis. Admin. Code § Comm 32.15 provides, with certain exceptions not applicable here, that "all places of employment and public b......
  • Commissioner of Labor v. Weekley Homes, No. COA03-1634.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • March 15, 2005
    ...health and safety standards to only its own employees. Next, petitioner contends that OSHA's own regulations, specifically 29 C.F.R. § 1910.2(a) (1998) and 1910.5(d) (1998), provide that one employer may not be cited for violations of another employer's infractions. As previously stated, Co......
  • Division of Occupational Safety & Health v. State Bd. of Control
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • February 19, 1987
    ...By definition, regulated employers under federal OSHA do not include the political subdivisions of a state. (29 U.S.C. § 652(5); 29 C.F.R. § 1910.2(c).) 6 On the other hand, the state OSHA broadly defines the "places of employment" over which the Division exercises safety jurisdiction to in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT