25 CFR 2.2 - Definitions

Cite as25 CFR 2.2
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 practice notes
  • Preservation of Los Olivos v. Dept. of Interior, Case No. CV 06-1502 AHM (CTx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • July 8, 2008
    ...Appeals." An "interested party" is defined as "any person whose interests could be adversely affected by a decision in an appeal." 25 C.F.R. § 2.2. There is no question that these regulations are binding on the BIA and IBIA. As Plaintiff stresses, the BIA even attached a copy of the chapter......
  • Crawford-Hall v. United States, Case No. 2:17-cv-01616-SVW-AFM
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • February 13, 2019
    ...Secretary's authority to take jurisdiction over IBIA appeals includes a definition of the term "Assistant Secretary" at all. See 25 C.F.R. § 2.2 (no definition of the term "Assistant Secretary"); 43 C.F.R. § 4.201 (no definition of the term "Assistant Secretary" despite defining the Secreta......
  • Mason v. United States, No. 417-70.
    • United States
    • Court of Federal Claims
    • June 16, 1972
    ...as a "decision" the action of the Osage Agency in paying the tax; some more formal determination seems to have been contemplated since 25 CFR § 2.2 and 2.4 require such "decisions" to be put in writing and that notice be given to the affected Indian—and neither of these directives was fulfi......
  • Nulankeyutmonen Nkihtaqmikon v. Impson, No. 06-2733.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • September 14, 2007
    ...which allow "any person whose interests could be adversely affected by a decision in an appeal" to request review of an agency action. 25 C.F.R. § 2.2; see also id. § 162.113 (allowing appeal of BIA lease approvals pursuant to 25 C.F.R. pt. 2). 503 F.3d 30 Furthermore, "[t]he ['zone of inte......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
28 cases
  • Preservation of Los Olivos v. Dept. of Interior, Case No. CV 06-1502 AHM (CTx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • July 8, 2008
    ...Appeals." An "interested party" is defined as "any person whose interests could be adversely affected by a decision in an appeal." 25 C.F.R. § 2.2. There is no question that these regulations are binding on the BIA and IBIA. As Plaintiff stresses, the BIA even attached a copy of the chapter......
  • Crawford-Hall v. United States, Case No. 2:17-cv-01616-SVW-AFM
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • February 13, 2019
    ...Secretary's authority to take jurisdiction over IBIA appeals includes a definition of the term "Assistant Secretary" at all. See 25 C.F.R. § 2.2 (no definition of the term "Assistant Secretary"); 43 C.F.R. § 4.201 (no definition of the term "Assistant Secretary" despite defining the Secreta......
  • Nulankeyutmonen Nkihtaqmikon v. Impson, No. 06-2733.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • September 14, 2007
    ...which allow "any person whose interests could be adversely affected by a decision in an appeal" to request review of an agency action. 25 C.F.R. § 2.2; see also id. § 162.113 (allowing appeal of BIA lease approvals pursuant to 25 C.F.R. pt. 2). 503 F.3d 30 Furthermore, "[t]he ['zone of inte......
  • Mason v. United States, No. 417-70.
    • United States
    • Court of Federal Claims
    • June 16, 1972
    ...as a "decision" the action of the Osage Agency in paying the tax; some more formal determination seems to have been contemplated since 25 CFR § 2.2 and 2.4 require such "decisions" to be put in writing and that notice be given to the affected Indian—and neither of these directives was fulfi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT