24 CFR 8.3 - Definitions

Cite as24 CFR 8.3
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
33 practice notes
  • Public Housing Capital Fund Program
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 24, 2013
    • 24 d4 Outubro d4 2013
    ...The following definitions apply to this part: 1937 Act. The term ``1937 Act'' is defined in 24 CFR 5.100. Accessible. As defined in 24 CFR 8.3. ACC. The Annual Contributions Contract between HUD and a PHA covering a public housing project or multiple public housing ACC Amendment. An Amendme......
  • Public Housing Program: Demolition or Disposition of Public Housing Projects, and Conversion of Public Housing to Tenant-Based Assistance
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 16, 2014
    • 16 d4 Outubro d4 2014
    ...to this section, and revise or remove others. Accessible or accessibility would be added, referencing the definition of ``accessible'' at 24 CFR 8.3. Commensurate public benefit would be added. While this phrase is used in current Sec. 970.19 to describe a standard for disposition of a prop......
  • Boston Housing Authority v. Bridgewaters, SJC-10107
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • 7 d3 Janeiro d3 2009
    ...as "any person who 452 Mass. 845 has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities." 24 C.F.R. § 8.3 (2008). "Working" is one of several "[m]ajor life activities." Id. See Wiesner v. 321 W. 16th St. Assocs., No. 00-Civ.-1423(RWS), 2000 WL 119107......
  • Reyes v. Fairfield Properties, No. 08-CV-0074 (JFB)(ETB).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • 24 d4 Setembro d4 2009
    ...payments program or a voucher program is not a "recipient" of federal financial assistance by virtue of receipt of such payments. See 24 C.F.R. § 8.3. Plaintiffs do not address this regulation in their papers, but rather generally suggest that receipt of Section 8 vouchers should be conside......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • Boston Housing Authority v. Bridgewaters, SJC-10107
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • 7 d3 Janeiro d3 2009
    ...as "any person who 452 Mass. 845 has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities." 24 C.F.R. § 8.3 (2008). "Working" is one of several "[m]ajor life activities." Id. See Wiesner v. 321 W. 16th St. Assocs., No. 00-Civ.-1423(RWS), 2000 WL 119107......
  • Reyes v. Fairfield Properties, No. 08-CV-0074 (JFB)(ETB).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • 24 d4 Setembro d4 2009
    ...payments program or a voucher program is not a "recipient" of federal financial assistance by virtue of receipt of such payments. See 24 C.F.R. § 8.3. Plaintiffs do not address this regulation in their papers, but rather generally suggest that receipt of Section 8 vouchers should be conside......
  • Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta, No. 92-8306
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • 27 d1 Setembro d1 1993
    ...(Energy); 15 C.F.R. Sec. 8b.3(g)(1)(i), (3)(i)(A), (3)(ii) (Commerce); 22 C.F.R. Sec. 142.3(j)(1)(i), (2)(i)(A), (2)(ii) (State); 24 C.F.R. Sec. 8.3 (HUD); 28 C.F.R. Sec. 42.540(k)(1)(i), (2)(i)(A), (2)(ii) (Justice); 29 C.F.R. Sec. 32.3 (Labor); 34 C.F.R. Sec. 104.3(j)(1)(i), (2)(i)(A), (2......
  • Logan v. Matveevskii, Case No. 10–CV–9247 KMK.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • 29 d1 Setembro d1 2014
    ...from the Office of Public and Indian Housing. Federal financial assistance and programs or activities are both defined very broadly. See 24 C.F.R. § 8.3 for the regulatory definitions.Effective January 26, 1992, Title II of the ADA required PHAs to conduct a self-evaluation of their current......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT