48 C.F.R. §9.403 - Definitions

Cite as48 C.F.R. §9.403
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Garufi v. U.S.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • January 3, 2001
    ...to negotiate contract changes and modifications. The debarment regulations themselves recognize the relevance of family connections. 48 C.F.R. § 9.403. Furthermore, Carmelo himself was appointed technical manager of Impredil, one of the component companies of JVC, and was listed as a compan......
  • BMY, A Div. of Harsco Corp. v. US, Civ. A. No. 88-536.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 2, 1988
    ...award. A contractor is "suspended" when it is temporarily disqualified from participating in any government contracts or subcontracts. 48 C.F.R. § 9.403 (1987). A contractor is "debarred" when it is excluded from participating in government contracts or subcontracts "for a reasonable, speci......
  • Robinson v. Cheney, 88-5126
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • May 23, 1989
    ...by information that, compared with that opposing it, leads to the conclusion that the fact at issue is more probably true than not." 48 C.F.R. Sec. 9.403. The FAR permit an agency to impute to a contractor the "seriously improper conduct of any officer, director, shareholder, partner, emplo......
  • COLEMAN AMERICAN MOVING SERVICES v. Weinberger, Civ. A. No. 86-T-1016-S.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Middle District of Alabama
    • February 15, 1989
    ...officer, Captain Shawn T. Gallagher concluded that (1) the indictment provided adequate evidence of an antitrust violation pursuant to 48 C.F.R. §§ 9.403 and 9.407-2(b); (2) the criminal violations charged in the indictment provided adequate cause for suspension of Coleman American and its ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT