16 CFR 801.1 - Definitions

Cite as16 CFR 801.1
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
94 practice notes
  • Changes To Require Identification of Attributable Owner
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 24, 2014
    • 24 Enero 2014
    ...and (2) enforcement entities. If applicable, the attributable owner would also include the ultimate parent entity as defined in 16 CFR 801.1(a)(3) of either of these two reporting categories. The Office proposes adopting this ``ultimate parent entity'' definition rather than creating a new ......
  • Research v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, Civil Case No. 13–1974 (BAH)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 30 Mayo 2014
    ...adds and defines three new terms: “[a]ll commercially significant rights,” 7 “[l]imited manufacturing rights,” 8 and “co-rights” 9 to 16 C.F.R. § 801.1, which contains HSR Act definitions, 78 Fed.Reg. at 68,712–13; JA at 14–15. The rulemaking process underlying the adoption of the Final Rul......
  • Adoption of N.J.A.C. 7:26B, In re
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • 6 Mayo 1991
    ...that ECRA applies. As DEP points out, percentage requirements of 50% or less have been used in other regulatory schemes: See, e.g., 16 C.F.R. 801.1(b) (50% test applied in the rules regarding premerger notification under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C.A. ......
  • Pharm. Research & Mfrs of Am. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, Civil Case No. 13–1974 BAH
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 30 Mayo 2014
    ...also adds and defines three new terms: “[a]ll commercially significant rights,”7 “[l]imited manufacturing rights,”8 and “co-rights”9 to 16 C.F.R. § 801.1, which contains HSR Act definitions, 78 Fed.Reg. at 68,712 –13; JA at 14–15. The rulemaking process underlying the adoption of the Final ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Research v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, Civil Case No. 13–1974 (BAH)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 30 Mayo 2014
    ...adds and defines three new terms: “[a]ll commercially significant rights,” 7 “[l]imited manufacturing rights,” 8 and “co-rights” 9 to 16 C.F.R. § 801.1, which contains HSR Act definitions, 78 Fed.Reg. at 68,712–13; JA at 14–15. The rulemaking process underlying the adoption of the Final Rul......
  • Adoption of N.J.A.C. 7:26B, In re
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • 6 Mayo 1991
    ...that ECRA applies. As DEP points out, percentage requirements of 50% or less have been used in other regulatory schemes: See, e.g., 16 C.F.R. 801.1(b) (50% test applied in the rules regarding premerger notification under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C.A. ......
  • Pharm. Research & Mfrs of Am. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, Civil Case No. 13–1974 BAH
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 30 Mayo 2014
    ...also adds and defines three new terms: “[a]ll commercially significant rights,”7 “[l]imited manufacturing rights,”8 and “co-rights”9 to 16 C.F.R. § 801.1, which contains HSR Act definitions, 78 Fed.Reg. at 68,712 –13; JA at 14–15. The rulemaking process underlying the adoption of the Final ......
  • Research v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, Civil Case No. 13-1974 (BAH)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 30 Mayo 2014
    ...also adds and defines three new terms: "[a]ll commercially significant rights,"7 "[l]imited manufacturing rights,"8 and "co-rights"9 to 16 C.F.R. § 801.1, which contains HSR Act definitions, 78 Fed. Reg. at 68,712-13; JA at 14-15. The rulemaking process underlying the adoption of the Final ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
59 firm's commentaries
  • Acquisition Structure Decision Tree: Choice and Acquisition of Entities in Texas Course
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 8 Mayo 2014
    ...2014 appeared at 79 Fed. Reg. 3814 (Jan. 23, 2014), and was effective on February 24, 2014. 112 16 C.F.R. § 801.2 (Nov. 15, 2013). 113 16 C.F.R. § 801.1(l) and § 801.3 (Nov. 15, 2013). 79 Fed. Reg. 3814 (Jan. 23, 2014), effective February 24, 2014, available at http://www.ftc.gov/sites/defa......
  • Acquisition Agreement Issues by Byron F. Egan
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 24 Agosto 2012
    ...2012 appeared at 77 Fed. Reg. 4324 (Jan. 27, 2012), and was effective on February 27, 2012. 103 16 C.F.R. § 801.2 (Jan. 11, 2006). 104 16 C.F.R. § 801.1(l) and § 801.3 (Jan. 11, 2006). 105 77 Fed. Reg. 4324 (Jan. 27, 2012), effective February 27, 2012, available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/201......
  • M&A Agreements: Opportunities And Perils In Asset Acquisitions
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 28 Diciembre 2011
    ...for 2011 appeared at 76 Reg. 4349 (Jan. 25, 2011), and was effective on February 24, 2011. 64 16 C.F.R. § 801.2 (Jan. 11, 2006). 65 16 C.F.R. § 801.1(l) and § 801.3 (Jan. 11, 2006). 66 76 Reg. 4349 (Jan. 25, 2011), effective February 24, 2011, http://www.ftc.gov/os/fedreg/2011/01/110121clay......
  • Acquisition Structure Decision Tree by Byron F. Egan
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 27 Abril 2012
    ...2012 appeared at 77 Fed. Reg. 4324 (Jan. 27, 2012), and was effective on February 27, 2012. 85 16 C.F.R. § 801.2 (Jan. 11, 2006). 86 16 C.F.R. § 801.1(l) and § 801.3 (Jan. 11, 2006). 87 77 Fed. Reg. 4324 (Jan. 27, 2012), effective February 27, 2012, available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2012/0......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT