5 CFR 1320.3 - Definitions

Cite as5 CFR 1320.3
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5488 practice notes
  • Transportation Department, Coast Guard,
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 30, 2002
    • May 30, 2002
    ...proposed rule would call for collections of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). As defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(c), ``collection of information'' comprises reporting, recordkeeping, monitoring, posting, labeling, and other similar actions. The titles and ......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 22, 2006
    • May 22, 2006
    ...proposed rule would call for a collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). As defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(c), ``collection of information'' comprises reporting, recordkeeping, monitoring, posting, labeling, and other, similar actions. The title and......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 12, 2008
    • February 12, 2008
    ...should be directed to Susan Grinder, by sending an e-mail to Psosupport@ahrq.hhs.gov or sending a fax to (301) 427-1341. Under 5 CFR 1320.3(c), a covered collection of information includes the requirement by an agency of a disclosure of information to third parties by means of identical rep......
  • National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards; and Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 08, 2014
    • October 8, 2014
    ...44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. The OMB control numbers for the EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers The information collection request (ICR) document prepared by the EPA for the amendments to the AMF MACT stand......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
  • Hyatt v. Office of Mgmt. & Budget, No. 17-17101
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • November 15, 2018
    ...did not contain any collections of information, because three regulatory exceptions to the definition of "information" applied. See 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(h)(1), (6), (9). Consequently, the agency concluded that the PTO Rules were not subject to the PRA.Hyatt filed a complaint with the district ......
  • H & L Axelsson, Inc. v. Pritzker, Civil Action No. 13–183 JBS/KMW.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • April 15, 2014
    ...disclosed, to a plan and/or an instrument calling for the collection or disclosure of information, or any of these, as appropriate.” 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c). The regulations continue: “A ‘collection of information’ may be in any form or format, including the use of ... instructions; ... automa......
  • H&L Axelsson, Inc. v. Pritzker, Civil Action No. 13–183 (JBS/KMW).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • April 15, 2014
    ...disclosed, to a plan and/or an instrument calling for the collection or disclosure of information, or any of these, as appropriate.” 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c). The regulations continue: “A ‘collection of information’ may be in any form or format, including the use of ... instructions; ... automa......
  • Wag-Aero, Inc. v. US, No. 92-C-1239.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court of Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • November 26, 1993
    ...administrative action is initiated, but only after a case file or its equivalent is opened with respect to a particular party.... 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c). According to the allegations of the Amended Complaint, the United States Department of Transportation distributed a circular to customers o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
  • Opportunity to Reform Existing PTO Regulations and Ease Patent Application Paperwork Burden
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • April 26, 2012
    ...of the agency's functions. . ."). 12 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(B) and 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(d)(1)(ii). 13 44 U.S.C. § 3502(11) and 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(l) 14 Information "quality" is defined in OMB's information quality guidelines, 67 Fed.Reg. 8451-60, http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_final_infor......
  • Did The CFPB Follow PRA Requirements In Issuing Its Big Tech Orders?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • November 23, 2021
    ...to mean obtaining answers to identical questions posed to "ten or more persons" within a twelve-month period. See 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 C.F.R 1320.3(c). This means that PRA requirements generally do not apply to information collected from nine or fewer institutions. However, OMB regulatio......
  • Did The CFPB Follow PRA Requirements In Issuing Its Big Tech Orders?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • November 23, 2021
    ...to mean obtaining answers to identical questions posed to "ten or more persons" within a twelve-month period. See 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 C.F.R 1320.3(c). This means that PRA requirements generally do not apply to information collected from nine or fewer institutions. However, OMB regulatio......
  • PTO Rules Not Subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • May 27, 2021
    ...or solicited through nonstandardized follow-up questions designed to clarify responses to approved collections of information.” 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.3(h)(1), (6), AAET made similar arguments in submitting three requests to OMB on PTO rules 105, 130, 131 and 132 and MPEP § 2173.05(n). In its res......
8 books & journal articles
  • When 30 Years of Practice Goes Against You: Patent Venue Ruling 'Ignores' Supreme Court Precedent
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-5, May 2018
    • May 1, 2018
    ...posed to, or identical reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed on, ten or more persons,” the relevant implementing regulation, 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c)(4)(i), clarifies that the scope of coverage embraces “any recordkeeping, reporting, or disclosure Continued on page 64 Published in Lan......
  • Attorney-Client Privilege for In-House Counsel
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-2, November 2017
    • November 1, 2017
    ...submissions to the USPTO, the Paperwork Reduction Act has its own notice-and-comment requirement, e.g. , 44 U.S.C. § § 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c)(4)(i). Most of the Patent Office’s procedural rules require notice-and-comment under the PRA. Agencies have discretion to choose between......
  • An Interview with Kent L. Richland
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-5, May 2018
    • May 1, 2018
    ...posed to, or identical reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed on, ten or more persons,” the relevant implementing regulation, 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c)(4)(i), clarifies that the scope of coverage embraces “any recordkeeping, reporting, or disclosure Continued on page 64 Published in Lan......
  • The PTAB Is Not an Article III Court, Part 2: Aqua Products v. Matal as a Case Study in Administrative Law
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-5, May 2018
    • May 1, 2018
    ...posed to, or identical reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed on, ten or more persons,” the relevant implementing regulation, 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c)(4)(i), clarifies that the scope of coverage embraces “any recordkeeping, reporting, or disclosure Continued on page 64 Published in Lan......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT