5 CFR 1320.3 - Definitions
| Cite as | 5 CFR 1320.3 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5487 practice notes
-
2015 Revisions and Confidentiality Determinations for Data Elements Under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule
...Burden Impacts of 2015 Revisions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule'' (see Docket Id. No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0526). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). The total estimated incremental burden and cost associated with the proposed revisions is 23,456 hours and $2,049,478 over the 3 years cov......
-
Benzidine-Based Chemical Substances; Di-n-pentyl Phthalate (DnPP); and Alkanes, C12-13, Chloro; Significant New Use Rule
...Act (PRA) This action does not impose any new information collection burden under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(b). The information collection activities associated with existing chemical SNURs are already approved by OMB under OMB control number 2070-003......
-
Boating safety: Uninspected passenger vessels,
...proposed rule would call for a collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). As defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(c), ``collection of information'' comprises reporting, recordkeeping, monitoring, posting, labeling, and other, similar actions. The title and......
-
Deeming Tobacco Products To Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as Amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; Restrictions on the Sale and Distribution of Tobacco Products and Required Warning Statements for Tobacco Products
...of information originally supplied by the Federal Government to the recipient for the purpose of ``disclosure to the public'' (5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2)). 2. Submitting Warning Plans for Cigar Manufacturers, Importers, Distributors, and Description of Respondents: The respondents to this collectio......
Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
-
Hyatt v. Office of Mgmt. & Budget, No. 17-17101
...did not contain any collections of information, because three regulatory exceptions to the definition of "information" applied. See 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(h)(1), (6), (9). Consequently, the agency concluded that the PTO Rules were not subject to the PRA.Hyatt filed a complaint with the district ......
-
H & L Axelsson, Inc. v. Pritzker, Civil Action No. 13–183 JBS/KMW.
...disclosed, to a plan and/or an instrument calling for the collection or disclosure of information, or any of these, as appropriate.” 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c). The regulations continue: “A ‘collection of information’ may be in any form or format, including the use of ... instructions; ... automa......
-
H&L Axelsson, Inc. v. Pritzker, Civil Action No. 13–183 (JBS/KMW).
...disclosed, to a plan and/or an instrument calling for the collection or disclosure of information, or any of these, as appropriate.” 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c). The regulations continue: “A ‘collection of information’ may be in any form or format, including the use of ... instructions; ... automa......
-
Wag-Aero, Inc. v. US, No. 92-C-1239.
...administrative action is initiated, but only after a case file or its equivalent is opened with respect to a particular party.... 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c). According to the allegations of the Amended Complaint, the United States Department of Transportation distributed a circular to customers o......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
Opportunity to Reform Existing PTO Regulations and Ease Patent Application Paperwork Burden
...of the agency's functions. . ."). 12 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(B) and 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(d)(1)(ii). 13 44 U.S.C. § 3502(11) and 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(l) 14 Information "quality" is defined in OMB's information quality guidelines, 67 Fed.Reg. 8451-60, http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_final_infor......
-
Did The CFPB Follow PRA Requirements In Issuing Its Big Tech Orders?
...to mean obtaining answers to identical questions posed to "ten or more persons" within a twelve-month period. See 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 C.F.R 1320.3(c). This means that PRA requirements generally do not apply to information collected from nine or fewer institutions. However, OMB regulatio......
-
Did The CFPB Follow PRA Requirements In Issuing Its Big Tech Orders?
...to mean obtaining answers to identical questions posed to "ten or more persons" within a twelve-month period. See 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 C.F.R 1320.3(c). This means that PRA requirements generally do not apply to information collected from nine or fewer institutions. However, OMB regulatio......
-
PTO Rules Not Subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
...or solicited through nonstandardized follow-up questions designed to clarify responses to approved collections of information.” 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.3(h)(1), (6), AAET made similar arguments in submitting three requests to OMB on PTO rules 105, 130, 131 and 132 and MPEP § 2173.05(n). In its res......
8 books & journal articles
-
When 30 Years of Practice Goes Against You: Patent Venue Ruling 'Ignores' Supreme Court Precedent
...posed to, or identical reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed on, ten or more persons,” the relevant implementing regulation, 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c)(4)(i), clarifies that the scope of coverage embraces “any recordkeeping, reporting, or disclosure Continued on page 64 Published in Lan......
-
Attorney-Client Privilege for In-House Counsel
...submissions to the USPTO, the Paperwork Reduction Act has its own notice-and-comment requirement, e.g. , 44 U.S.C. § § 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c)(4)(i). Most of the Patent Office’s procedural rules require notice-and-comment under the PRA. Agencies have discretion to choose between......
-
An Interview with Kent L. Richland
...posed to, or identical reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed on, ten or more persons,” the relevant implementing regulation, 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c)(4)(i), clarifies that the scope of coverage embraces “any recordkeeping, reporting, or disclosure Continued on page 64 Published in Lan......
-
The PTAB Is Not an Article III Court, Part 2: Aqua Products v. Matal as a Case Study in Administrative Law
...posed to, or identical reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed on, ten or more persons,” the relevant implementing regulation, 5 C.F.R. § 1320.3(c)(4)(i), clarifies that the scope of coverage embraces “any recordkeeping, reporting, or disclosure Continued on page 64 Published in Lan......
Request a trial to view additional results