8 C.F.R. §208.15 - Definition of "firm resettlement."

Cite as8 C.F.R. §208.15
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
70 cases
  • E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr, Case No. 19-cv-04073-JST
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • 24 Julio 2019
    ...denial of asylum. See Mamouzian v. Ashcroft , 390 F.3d 1129, 1138 (9th Cir. 2004) ("Stays in third countries are now governed by 8 C.F.R. § 208.15, which specifies how and when an opportunity to reside in a third country justifies a denial of asylum."); Andriasian v. I.N.S. , 180 F.3d 1033,......
  • de la Llana Castellon v. I.N.S., LLANA-CASTELLO
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • 16 Febrero 1994
    ...or while in that nation received, an offer of permanent resident status, citizenship or some other type of permanent resettlement." 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.15. The BIA should consider on remand whether the additional evidence introduced by Petitioners on appeal clarifying that Petitioner's legal ......
  • Maharaj v. Gonzales, 03-71066.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • 9 Junio 2006
    ...ties in that country; or that the conditions of his residence in that country were so restricted that he was not in fact resettled. 8 C.F.R. § 208.15 The Maharajes lived in Canada for four years after leaving Fiji. They worked in Canada and had a child there. Their older children were affor......
  • Hotel and Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. Smith, 84-5859
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 20 Mayo 1988
    ...1984 the INS informed Hernandez of its intent to revoke his asylum, giving him fifteen days to examine and rebut the evidence. See 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.15(b). Hernandez did not respond at all and his asylum was consequently revoked. Paradoxically then, Hernandez' asylum was revoked because he ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT