37 CFR 41.125 - Decision on motions
| Cite as | 37 CFR 41.125 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
91 practice notes
-
Appeals
...In re Procter & Gamble Co., 749 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2014); In re MCM Portfolio, LLC, 554 F. App’x 944 (Fed. Cir. 2014). 23. 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.125, 42.71(d). 24. 35 U.S.C. §§ 319, 329; In re Cuozzo, 793 F.3d at 1272 (“We have jurisdiction to review the Board’s inal decision under 28 U.S.C......
-
Enzo Therapeutics v. Yeda Research and Dev. Co., Civil Action No. 2:06cv377.
...Director. On August 16, 2005, Enzo requested a rehearing of the Motion for Benefit ("Request for Rehearing"), pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.125(c), and filed a petition requesting the Chief Administrative Judge to instruct the Board to withdraw its denial of Enzo's Motion for Benefit......
-
Enzo Therapeutics v. Yeda Research and Dev. Co., Civil Action No. 2:06cv377.
...any motion, and may take such other action appropriate to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of the proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 41.125(a). Although the issue before the Court concerns a "petition" under § 1.137(b), § 41.125, concerning "motions," provides......
-
University of Western Australia v. Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden, Patent Interference 106
...parties to the agreement or understanding." 35 U.S.C. 135(c); see also Bd.R. 205 (settlement agreements). Decision - Motions - 37 CFR § 41.125(a) This interference is between University of Western Australia (UWA) Patent 8, 455, 636 and Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden (AZL) Application 11/......
Request a trial to view additional results
64 cases
-
Enzo Therapeutics v. Yeda Research and Dev. Co., Civil Action No. 2:06cv377.
...against the Director. On August 16, 2005, Enzo requested a rehearing of the Motion for Benefit ("Request for Rehearing"), pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.125(c), and filed a petition requesting the Chief Administrative Judge to instruct the Board to withdraw its denial of Enzo's Motion for Benef......
-
Enzo Therapeutics v. Yeda Research and Dev. Co., Civil Action No. 2:06cv377.
...any motion, and may take such other action appropriate to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of the proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 41.125(a). Although the issue before the Court concerns a "petition" under § 1.137(b), § 41.125, concerning "motions," provides general support for......
-
University of Western Australia v. Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden, Patent Interference 106
...the said parties to the agreement or understanding." 35 U.S.C. 135(c); see also Bd.R. 205 (settlement agreements). Decision - Motions - 37 CFR § 41.125(a) This interference is between University of Western Australia (UWA) Patent 8, 455, 636 and Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden (AZL) Application......
-
Human Genome Sciences, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., Civ. No. 08-166-SLR.
...and "may take such other action appropriate to secure the Page 519 just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of the proceeding." 37 C.F.R. § 41.125(a). A rehearing may be requested on a decision on motions within 14 days of the Board's decision; a panel may be requested for the review.8 3......
Request a trial to view additional results
26 firm's commentaries
-
USPTO And Copyright Office Exercise Emergency Powers Granted By CARES Act To Provide Further Relief During COVID-19 Crisis
...within the original deadline was or may be delayed due to the COVID-19 outbreak: a request for rehearing of a PTAB decision under 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.125(c), 41.127(d), or 42.71(d); a petition to the Chief Judge under 37 C.F.R. § 41.3; a patent owner preliminary response in a trial proceeding u......
-
PTAB Digest 2021/2022: The Latest Trends and Developments in Post-Grant Proceedings
...of conception, diligence, and reduction to practice of such a claim.4 Interference No. 106,048, paper 893, Decision on Motions under 37 CFR 41.125(a), at p. 22.5 Id.6 Regents of Univ. of California v. Broad Inst., Inc., 903 F.3d 1286 (Fed. Cir. 2018).7 Interference No. 106,115, paper 1, Dec......
-
COVID-19: Patent and Trademark Office Updates as of April 22, 2020
...in subsection (1)(b), the PTAB shall provide a 30-day extension of time for: i) a request for rehearing of a PTAB decision under 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.125(c), 41.127(d), or ii) a petition to the Chief Judge under 37 C.F.R. § 41.3; or iii) a patent owner preliminary response in a trial proceeding ......
-
COVID-19: Patent and Trademark Office Updates as of April 1, 2020
...in subsection (1)(b), the PTAB shall provide a 30-day extension of time for: i) a request for rehearing of a PTAB decision under 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.125(c), 41.127(d), or ii) a petition to the Chief Judge under 37 C.F.R. § 41.3; or iii) a patent owner preliminary response in a trial proceeding ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Appeals
...2014); In re Procter & Gamble Co., 749 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2014); In re MCM Portfolio, LLC, 554 F. App’x 944 (Fed. Cir. 2014). 23. 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.125, 42.71(d). 24. 35 U.S.C. §§ 319, 329; In re Cuozzo, 793 F.3d at 1272 (“We have jurisdiction to review the Board’s inal decision under 28 U.......