19 CFR 111.94 - Decision on monetary penalty

Cite as19 CFR 111.94
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • US v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc., Slip Op. 10-11. Court No. 04-00650.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • January 28, 2010
    ..."appropriate customs officer" is usually the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer ("FP & F Officer") for the relevant port. See 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.94, 171.31.2 The trial record establishes that the FP & F Officer required to consider the ten factors in imposing the penalties at issue was......
  • Lee v. U.S., SLIP.OP. 02-33.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • March 29, 2002
    ...Mr. Lee's failures to make timely payment themselves constituted new breaches of Customs regulations—specifically, 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.29 and 111.94.1 Invoking 19 C.F.R. § 111.53,2 Customs sought revocation of Mr. Lee's license based on the new charges. The specific facts underlying the new ch......
  • Shiepe v. U.S., Slip Op. 15.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • February 4, 1999
    ...and/or (c) violated any provision of any law enforced by Customs or the rules or regulations issued under any such provision, and (5) 19 C.F.R. § 111.94, requiring payment of an assessed broker's penalty within 60 days of the date of a final determination that the broker is liable for a mon......
  • Lee v. U.S., No. 02-1404.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • May 12, 2003
    ...to tender timely payment of the original $250 penalty within 60 days of the final determination, a violation of 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.29 and 111.94.1 Specification II dealt with Mr. Lee's failure to pay the $30,000 penalty within 60 days of the final determination, a violation of the same regula......
4 cases
  • Lee v. U.S., SLIP.OP. 02-33.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • March 29, 2002
    ...Mr. Lee's failures to make timely payment themselves constituted new breaches of Customs regulations—specifically, 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.29 and 111.94.1 Invoking 19 C.F.R. § 111.53,2 Customs sought revocation of Mr. Lee's license based on the new charges. The specific facts underlying the new ch......
  • US v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc., Slip Op. 10-11. Court No. 04-00650.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • January 28, 2010
    ..."appropriate customs officer" is usually the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer ("FP & F Officer") for the relevant port. See 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.94, 171.31.2 The trial record establishes that the FP & F Officer required to consider the ten factors in imposing the penalties at issue was......
  • Shiepe v. U.S., Slip Op. 15.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • February 4, 1999
    ...and/or (c) violated any provision of any law enforced by Customs or the rules or regulations issued under any such provision, and (5) 19 C.F.R. § 111.94, requiring payment of an assessed broker's penalty within 60 days of the date of a final determination that the broker is liable for a mon......
  • Lee v. U.S., No. 02-1404.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • May 12, 2003
    ...to tender timely payment of the original $250 penalty within 60 days of the final determination, a violation of 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.29 and 111.94.1 Specification II dealt with Mr. Lee's failure to pay the $30,000 penalty within 60 days of the final determination, a violation of the same regula......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT