36 C.F.R. 219.14 - Decision document and planning records

Cite as36 C.F.R. 219.14
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
70 practice notes
  • Guardians v. United States Forest Serv., No. 06–2306.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • April 21, 2011
    ...species listed in the plan, to the extent the plan does not conflict with the ‘best available science’ standard.”); see also 36 C.F.R. § 219.14(f) (2005) (noting that the USFS must comply with plans developed prior to November 9, 2000, that “specifically require[ ] population monitoring or ......
  • The Lands Council v. McNair, No. 07-35000.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • July 2, 2008
    ...or a proposed project or activity area is not required, but may be conducted at the discretion of the Responsible official." 36 C.F.R. § 219.14 (2007) (emphasis added). The Forest Service did not designate the flammulated owl as an MIS and, in any case, Lands Council does not argue tha......
  • Forest Guardians v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 06-2306.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • August 26, 2009
    ...species listed in the plan, to the extent the plan does not conflict with the `best available science' standard."); see also 36 C.F.R. § 219.14(f) (2005) (noting that the USFS must comply with plans developed prior to November 9, 2000, that "specifically require[] population monit......
  • Cascadia Wildlands Project v. U.S. Forest Service, No. Civ. 05-76-JE.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Oregon)
    • August 12, 2005
    ...analysis relating to habitat unless the plan specifically requires population monitoring or population surveys for the species." 36 C.F.R. § 219.14. Defendants contend that any claim of alleged failure to comply with requirements to monitor MIS by obtaining quantitative population data......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
25 cases
  • Guardians v. United States Forest Serv., No. 06–2306.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • April 21, 2011
    ...species listed in the plan, to the extent the plan does not conflict with the ‘best available science’ standard.”); see also 36 C.F.R. § 219.14(f) (2005) (noting that the USFS must comply with plans developed prior to November 9, 2000, that “specifically require[ ] population monitoring or ......
  • The Lands Council v. McNair, No. 07-35000.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • July 2, 2008
    ...surveying or a proposed project or activity area is not required, but may be conducted at the discretion of the Responsible official." 36 C.F.R. § 219.14 (2007) (emphasis added). The Forest Service did not designate the flammulated owl as an MIS and, in any case, Lands Council does not argu......
  • Forest Guardians v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 06-2306.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • August 26, 2009
    ...species listed in the plan, to the extent the plan does not conflict with the `best available science' standard."); see also 36 C.F.R. § 219.14(f) (2005) (noting that the USFS must comply with plans developed prior to November 9, 2000, that "specifically require[] population monitoring or p......
  • Cascadia Wildlands Project v. U.S. Forest Service, No. Civ. 05-76-JE.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Oregon)
    • August 12, 2005
    ...and analysis relating to habitat unless the plan specifically requires population monitoring or population surveys for the species." 36 C.F.R. § 219.14. Defendants contend that any claim of alleged failure to comply with requirements to monitor MIS by obtaining quantitative population data ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Final Auer: How Weakening the Deference Doctrine May Impact Environmental Law
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter Nbr. 45-10, October 2015
    • October 1, 2015
    ...F.3d at 1049 ( citing 16 U.S.C. §1604(a) & (i)). 149. Id . at 1049 ( citing 36 C.F.R. §219.19 (1982)). 150. Id . at 1050 ( citing 36 C.F.R. §219.14(f) (2005)). Copyright © 2015 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-4......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT