36 C.F.R. 219.14 - Decision document and planning records
| Cite as | 36 C.F.R. 219.14 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
70 practice notes
-
Guardians v. United States Forest Serv., No. 06–2306.
...species listed in the plan, to the extent the plan does not conflict with the ‘best available science’ standard.”); see also 36 C.F.R. § 219.14(f) (2005) (noting that the USFS must comply with plans developed prior to November 9, 2000, that “specifically require[ ] population monitoring or ......
-
The Lands Council v. McNair, No. 07-35000.
...or a proposed project or activity area is not required, but may be conducted at the discretion of the Responsible official." 36 C.F.R. § 219.14 (2007) (emphasis added). The Forest Service did not designate the flammulated owl as an MIS and, in any case, Lands Council does not argue tha......
-
Forest Guardians v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 06-2306.
...species listed in the plan, to the extent the plan does not conflict with the `best available science' standard."); see also 36 C.F.R. § 219.14(f) (2005) (noting that the USFS must comply with plans developed prior to November 9, 2000, that "specifically require[] population monit......
-
Cascadia Wildlands Project v. U.S. Forest Service, No. Civ. 05-76-JE.
...analysis relating to habitat unless the plan specifically requires population monitoring or population surveys for the species." 36 C.F.R. § 219.14. Defendants contend that any claim of alleged failure to comply with requirements to monitor MIS by obtaining quantitative population data......
Request a trial to view additional results
25 cases
-
Guardians v. United States Forest Serv., No. 06–2306.
...species listed in the plan, to the extent the plan does not conflict with the ‘best available science’ standard.”); see also 36 C.F.R. § 219.14(f) (2005) (noting that the USFS must comply with plans developed prior to November 9, 2000, that “specifically require[ ] population monitoring or ......
-
The Lands Council v. McNair, No. 07-35000.
...surveying or a proposed project or activity area is not required, but may be conducted at the discretion of the Responsible official." 36 C.F.R. § 219.14 (2007) (emphasis added). The Forest Service did not designate the flammulated owl as an MIS and, in any case, Lands Council does not argu......
-
Forest Guardians v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 06-2306.
...species listed in the plan, to the extent the plan does not conflict with the `best available science' standard."); see also 36 C.F.R. § 219.14(f) (2005) (noting that the USFS must comply with plans developed prior to November 9, 2000, that "specifically require[] population monitoring or p......
-
Cascadia Wildlands Project v. U.S. Forest Service, No. Civ. 05-76-JE.
...and analysis relating to habitat unless the plan specifically requires population monitoring or population surveys for the species." 36 C.F.R. § 219.14. Defendants contend that any claim of alleged failure to comply with requirements to monitor MIS by obtaining quantitative population data ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Final Auer: How Weakening the Deference Doctrine May Impact Environmental Law
...F.3d at 1049 ( citing 16 U.S.C. §1604(a) & (i)). 149. Id . at 1049 ( citing 36 C.F.R. §219.19 (1982)). 150. Id . at 1050 ( citing 36 C.F.R. §219.14(f) (2005)). Copyright © 2015 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-4......