50 C.F.R. 226.212 - Critical habitat for 15 Distinct Population Segments (DPSs) of salmon and steelhead (Oncorhynchus spp.) in Washington, Oregon and Idaho

Cite as50 C.F.R. 226.212
CurrencyCurrent through December 7, 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • 647 F.Supp.2d 1221 (D.Or. 2009), CV 08-939-MO, Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. National Marine Fisheries Service
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 9th Circuit District of Oregon
    • August 12, 2009
    ...pt. 226). The critical habitat includes the area of the proposed dock. Tryon Creek is designated critical habitat for LCR steelhead. 50 C.F.R. § 226.212(s)(8)(i). A BiOp must detail how an agency action impacts critical habitat and whether those impacts are likely to constitute destruction ......
  • McKenzie Flyfishers v. McIntosh, 031315 ORDC, 6:13-cv-02125-TC
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 9th Circuit District of Oregon
    • March 13, 2015
    ...impassible natural barriers for spring Chinook salmon in the Upper Willamette River ESU. 65 Fed. Reg. 7764, 7778 (Feb. 16, 2000); 50 C.F.R. § 226.212. In 2000 and 2005, NMFS promulgated regulations under § 4(d) that extended the§ 9 "take" prohibition to wild spring Chinook salmon ......
  • Stout v. U.S. Forest Service, 031011 ORDC, 09-152-HA
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 9th Circuit District of Oregon
    • March 10, 2011
    ...There is no dispute that threatened MCR steelhead and designated critical habitat are present within the Murderer's Creek WHT. See 50 C.F.R. § 226.212(r). Therefore, because the Forest Service was aware that a listed species was present in the area of its proposed action, it was required to......
3 cases
  • 647 F.Supp.2d 1221 (D.Or. 2009), CV 08-939-MO, Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. National Marine Fisheries Service
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 9th Circuit District of Oregon
    • August 12, 2009
    ...pt. 226). The critical habitat includes the area of the proposed dock. Tryon Creek is designated critical habitat for LCR steelhead. 50 C.F.R. § 226.212(s)(8)(i). A BiOp must detail how an agency action impacts critical habitat and whether those impacts are likely to constitute destruction ......
  • McKenzie Flyfishers v. McIntosh, 031315 ORDC, 6:13-cv-02125-TC
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 9th Circuit District of Oregon
    • March 13, 2015
    ...impassible natural barriers for spring Chinook salmon in the Upper Willamette River ESU. 65 Fed. Reg. 7764, 7778 (Feb. 16, 2000); 50 C.F.R. § 226.212. In 2000 and 2005, NMFS promulgated regulations under § 4(d) that extended the§ 9 "take" prohibition to wild spring Chinook salmon ......
  • Stout v. U.S. Forest Service, 031011 ORDC, 09-152-HA
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 9th Circuit District of Oregon
    • March 10, 2011
    ...There is no dispute that threatened MCR steelhead and designated critical habitat are present within the Murderer's Creek WHT. See 50 C.F.R. § 226.212(r). Therefore, because the Forest Service was aware that a listed species was present in the area of its proposed action, it was required to......