Covered employer
| Currency | Current through May 31, 2023 |
| Citation | 29 C.F.R. §825.104 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Shipton v. Balt. Gas & Elec. Co.
...interest in another corporation, it is a separate employer" unless it meets either the joint employer or integrated employer test. 29 C.F.R. §§ 825.104, 825.106. While Shipton discusses the joint employer test, he does not show that it applies here. Shipton argues that Exelon and ESBC are a......
-
McKenzie v. Erie Cnty. Med. Ctr. Corp., 17-CV-647S
...each working day during each of 20 or more calendar workweeks in the current or preceding calendar year." 29 U.S.C. § 2611(4) (2002). 29 C.F.R. § 825.104. McKenzie has not alleged any facts to this effect. See Pesok v. Hebrew Union Coll.-Jewish Inst. of Religion, 235 F. Supp. 2d 281, 289-90......
-
Kammerer v. Univ. of Kan.
...(explaining that a bedrock of statutory construction is that a court must give effect to each clause and word of a statute). [38] 29 C.F.R. § 825.104 employer covered by FMLA is any person engaged in commerce or in any industry or activity affecting commerce, who employs 50 or more employee......
3 firm's commentaries
-
Dickinson Wright COVID-19 Resource Guide
...between their operations, whether there is centralized control of labor relations, and the degree of common ownership/control. See 29 CFR 825.104(c)(2). If two entities constitute an integrated employer under the FMLA, then employees of all entities making up the integrated employer will be......
-
Seventh Circuit Respects Corporate Formalities in Assessing Title VII Coverage
...respect corporate formalities. While some federal laws examine the integration between two entities to determine coverage, see, e.g., 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(c) (FMLA), integration alone is not enough under Title VII and the other civil rights laws. Instead, employees of separate entities will ......
-
Families First Coronavirus Response Act: Emergency Family and Medical Leave Provisions (Part 2 of 2)
...of Emergency FMLA leave under the Act, “50 or more” is amended to read “fewer than 500.” [View source.] Christy Phanthavong Lily Kurland 29 CFR § 825.104. For purposes of Emergency FMLA leave under the Act, “50 or more” is amended to read “fewer than [View source.] Christy Phanthavong Lily ......
49 books & journal articles
-
VOLUME I Chapter 11 Family and Medical Leave Act
...asserting violations of the FMLA. See Knussman v. Maryland, 935 F. Supp. 659 (D. Md. 1996).[12] 29 U.S.C. § 825.108(d) (2015).[13] 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(c)(2) (2015).[14] Id.[15] Id.[16] 29 C.F.R. § 825.106(a) (2015).[17] 29 C.F.R. § 825.106(b) (2015).[18] 29 C.F.R. § 865.106(c) (2015).[19] 2......
Get Started for Free
