Covered employer

Citation 29 C.F.R. §825.104
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Shipton v. Balt. Gas & Elec. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • July 31, 2024
    ...interest in another corporation, it is a separate employer" unless it meets either the joint employer or integrated employer test. 29 C.F.R. §§ 825.104, 825.106. While Shipton discusses the joint employer test, he does not show that it applies here. Shipton argues that Exelon and ESBC are a......
  • McKenzie v. Erie Cnty. Med. Ctr. Corp., 17-CV-647S
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • November 4, 2019
    ...each working day during each of 20 or more calendar workweeks in the current or preceding calendar year." 29 U.S.C. § 2611(4) (2002). 29 C.F.R. § 825.104. McKenzie has not alleged any facts to this effect. See Pesok v. Hebrew Union Coll.-Jewish Inst. of Religion, 235 F. Supp. 2d 281, 289-90......
  • Kammerer v. Univ. of Kan.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • November 6, 2024
    ...(explaining that a bedrock of statutory construction is that a court must give effect to each clause and word of a statute). [38] 29 C.F.R. § 825.104 employer covered by FMLA is any person engaged in commerce or in any industry or activity affecting commerce, who employs 50 or more employee......
4 books & journal articles
  • VOLUME I Chapter 11 Family and Medical Leave Act
    • United States
    • South Carolina Bar Labor and Employment Law for South Carolina Lawyers, Volumes I and II (SCBar)
    • Invalid date
    ...asserting violations of the FMLA. See Knussman v. Maryland, 935 F. Supp. 659 (D. Md. 1996).[12] 29 U.S.C. § 825.108(d) (2015).[13] 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(c)(2) (2015).[14] Id.[15] Id.[16] 29 C.F.R. § 825.106(a) (2015).[17] 29 C.F.R. § 825.106(b) (2015).[18] 29 C.F.R. § 865.106(c) (2015).[19] 2......
  • Section 5 Private Employers
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Employment Discrimination Deskbook Chapter 13 Family and Medical Leave Act
    • Invalid date
    ...or in any activity affecting commerce, with 50 or more employees for 20 or more work weeks in the current or preceding calendar year. 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(a); 29 U.S.C. § 2611(4). “For purposes of the FMLA, employers who meet the 50-employee coverage test are deemed” to affect commerce. 29 C......
  • Section 8 Individual Liability
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Employment Discrimination Deskbook Chapter 13 Family and Medical Leave Act
    • Invalid date
    ...§ 203(d). The implementing regulations of the FMLA recognize the similarities of the FMLA and the FLSA definitions of employer. 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(d). These regulations suggest that individual liability arises under FMLA. Id. But see Frizzell v. Sw. Motor Freight, Inc., 906 F. Supp. 441 (E......
  • Section 4 Covered Employers
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Employer-Employee Law Deskbook Chapter 7 Employee RightsLeaves of Absence, Uniformed Services Employment, Workers Compensation Retaliation, and Related Topics
    • Invalid date
    ...29 U.S.C. § 2611(4). For purposes of the FMLA, employers who meet the fifty-employee coverage test are deemed to affect commerce. 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(b). Any public agency, as defined in the FLSA, is a public employer covered under the act. 29 C.F.R. § 825.108(a); see 29 U.S.C. § 203. Examp......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT