37 CFR 1.33 - Correspondence respecting patent applications, patent reexamination proceedings, and other proceedings

Cite as37 CFR 1.33
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
37 practice notes
  • Patent cases: Patent business goals; implementation,
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 05, 1998
    • October 5, 1998
    ...certain actions in an application. For example, only an attorney or agent that is of record can change the correspondence address. See 37 CFR 1.33(a). In addition, only an attorney or agent that is of record may execute a power to inspect. See 37 CFR The PTO is also considering amending 37 ......
  • Practice and procedure: Patent and trademark cases rules of practice; representation of others before Patent and Trademark Office,
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 12, 2003
    • December 12, 2003
    ...proceedings. Practitioners not wishing to receive notices regarding maintenance fees may file a change of correspondence address under 37 CFR 1.33 without filing a request to withdraw, or provide a fee address pursuant to 37 CFR 1.363 to which maintenance fee correspondence should be sent. ......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 12, 2003
    • December 12, 2003
    ...proceedings. Practitioners not wishing to receive notices regarding maintenance fees may file a change of correspondence address under 37 CFR 1.33 without filing a request to withdraw, or provide a fee address pursuant to 37 CFR 1.363 to which maintenance fee correspondence should be sent. ......
  • Legal Framework for Electronic Filing System - Web (EFS-Web)
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 27, 2009
    • October 27, 2009
    ...it to a PDF file. Any follow-on documents, such as an amendment filed in an application, must also be signed in accordance with 37 CFR 1.33(b). Even though a new patent application is entitled to a filing date if it complies with all the statutory requirements set forth in 35 U.S.C. 111(a) ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Tube-Mac Indus., Inc. v. Campbell, 2:19-cv-01192-RJC
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. Western District of Pennsylvania
    • April 20, 2020
    ...law firm, to support their assertion that Defendants designated an agent for service pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 293. Opp'n 9, ECF No. 60. 37 C.F.R. § 1.33 provides that a correspondence address is required when a patent application is filed, and further provides the types of correspondence whi......
  • Tube-Mac Indus., Inc. v. Campbell, 2:19-cv-01192-RJC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Pennsylvania
    • April 20, 2020
    ...law firm, to support their assertion that Defendants designated an agent for service pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 293. Opp'n 9, ECF No. 60. 37 C.F.R. § 1.33 provides that a correspondence address is required when a patent application is filed, and further provides the types of correspondence whi......
  • Rydeen v. Quigg, Civ. A. No. 88-1786.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • October 18, 1990
    ...fee. 3 A power of attorney was filed with the Patent Office identifying C. Bruzga as the attorney of record. 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.363(a), 1.33(a) and 4 At the time Bruzga prosecuted the patent application for plaintiff he lived in Schenectady, New York. In 1985, Bruzga relocated to New York City,......
  • Sun Studs, Inc. v. Applied Theory Associates, Inc., Nos. 84-986
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • September 13, 1985
    ...with the persons named in the original power of attorney even after an assignment is recorded unless the assignee otherwise requests. 37 C.F.R. Sec. 1.33(a). Thus, it is routine for an inventor to execute an application appointing the attorneys who prepared the application at the direction ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT