24 C.F.R. §570.910 - Corrective and remedial actions

Cite as24 C.F.R. §570.910
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • Latinos Unidos De Chelsea En Accion (Lucha) v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 85-1573
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • August 12, 1986
    ...with applicable laws, and may impose conditions on a present year's grants as a result of the review of a prior year's program. 24 C.F.R. Sec. 570.910(b) (April Under the UDAG program, nondiscrimination provisions are built into the eligibility requirements. Cities may receive UDAG grants o......
  • United States ex rel. Freedom Unlimited, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh, 2:12cv1600
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. Western District of Pennsylvania
    • March 31, 2016
    ..."appropriate corrective or remedial actions," ranging from a warning letter to collection proceedings. 24 C.F.R. § 570.900(6) and 24 C.F.R. § 570.910 (identifying correctivePage 56 and remedial actions). Prior to imposing a "corrective or remedial action," HUD will consider the recipient's ......
  • Santiago ex rel. Muniz v. Hernandez, 97-CV-3201 FB.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • April 29, 1999
    ...scheme to address noncompliance for all community development programs, including CDBG funded programs. See 42 U.S.C. § 5311; 24 C.F.R. §§ 570.910-911, 982.406. This scheme supports a determination that Congress intended HUD to bear the primary responsibility for ensuring compliance with th......
  • Mair v. City of Albany, New York, 02-CV-1016.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of New York
    • January 22, 2004
    ...compliance with the [CDA], including the RLPHRA," which was enacted as a part of the CDA. Id. at 273 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 5311; 24 C.F.R. §§ 570.910-911, 982.406). The court then rejected the argument that the regulations implementing the statutes provided any enforcement right, noting that ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT