37 CFR 1.48 - Correction of inventorship pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 116 or correction of the name or order of names in a patent application, other than a reissue application

Cite as37 CFR 1.48
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
48 practice notes
  • Patent cases: Patent business goals; implementation,
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 05, 1998
    • October 5, 1998
    ...inform applicant(s) (e.g., through an attached Notice of Informal Application, PTO-152 ) that an oath or declaration is outstanding. 37 CFR 1.48(f)(1) would continue to provide that, in an application not including an executed oath or declaration, the submission of an executed oath or decla......
  • Examination Guidelines for Implementing the First-Inventor-to-File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
    • United States
    • Federal Register July 26, 2012
    • July 26, 2012
    ...inventor (pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(f)) will be handled in a derivation proceeding under 35 U.S.C. 135, by a correction of inventorship under 37 CFR 1.48 to name the actual inventor, or under 35 U.S.C. \2\ 35 U.S.C. 101 (``whoever invents or discovers * * *, may obtain a patent therefor, subjec......
  • Examination Guidelines for Implementing the First Inventor To File Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 14, 2013
    • February 14, 2013
    ...inventor (pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(f)) will be handled in a derivation proceeding under 35 U.S.C. 135, by a correction of inventorship under 37 CFR 1.48 to name the actual inventor, or through a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 101\48\ and 35 U.S.C. AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(c) provides for common ownership ......
  • Mas-Hamilton Group v. LaGard, Inc., No. CIV. A. 94-349.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Eastern District of Kentucky
    • March 5, 1997
    ...petition to correct inventorship with the Patent Office. LaGard's petition complied with the Patent Office's requirement set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 1.48(a)(1) inasmuch as it contained "a statement of facts verified by the original named inventor or inventors." Inventors Gartner and Phillips a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
33 cases
  • E-Z Bowz v. Professional Product Research Co., Inc., 00 Civ. 8670 (LTS) (GWG).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • September 5, 2003
    ...to amend the application to name Slater as a co-inventor. See Petition and Fee to Correct and/or Add to Originally Named Inventor(s) (37 CFR 1.48(a) and/or(c)), dated March 20, 1997 ("Pet. to Add Inventor") (reproduced in `979 History). Apparently, Slater was omitted because Caven......
  • Mas-Hamilton Group v. LaGard, Inc., No. CIV. A. 94-349.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Eastern District of Kentucky
    • March 5, 1997
    ...petition to correct inventorship with the Patent Office. LaGard's petition complied with the Patent Office's requirement set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 1.48(a)(1) inasmuch as it contained "a statement of facts verified by the original named inventor or inventors." Inventors Gartner and ......
  • Perseptive Biosystems v. Pharmacia Biotech, No. CIV. A. 93-12237-PBS.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • January 28, 1998
    ...256 concerns correcting inventorship of an issued patent. Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc., 29 F.3d 1570, 1573 (Fed.Cir.1994); see also 37 C.F.R. § 1.48 (providing procedure in patent office for correction of inventorship in patent application); 37 C.F.R. § 1.324 (providing procedure in pa......
  • Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary v. Qlt Phototherap., No. 07-2615.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • January 12, 2009
    ...116 permits the Patent and Trademark Office to correct inventorship in a patent application only with the consent of all parties)(citing 37 C.F.R. § 1.48); 35 U.S.C. § 256 (permitting the Patent 552 F.3d 65 and Trademark Office to correct inventorship of an issued patent with the consent of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 firm's commentaries
  • CVC Files Substantive Motion No. 3 (for Improper Inventorship) and Broad Opposes
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • December 31, 2020
    ...inventorship, particularly after enactment of the America Invents Act (see "The Disappearance of Deceptive Intent in S. 23") under 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.48, 1.324, and 41.121(a)(2). This motion contains 14 sets of declarations and other papers required for Broad to change inventorship in U.S. Pate......
  • Broad Files Reply to CVC's Opposition to Broad's Contingent Motion to Correct Inventorship
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 2, 2021
    ...argument, that the Director and not the Board is empowered to correct inventorship. Authority Broad cites in this regard include 37 C.F.R. § 1.48(i) and § 1.324(d), as well as other interference decisions such as Flamm v. Vinogradov, Patent Int. No. 104,807, Paper No. 20 (B.P.A.I. Dec. 11, ......
  • Working With Inventors Post-AIA: Managing Inventor Challenges And Preventing Common Mistakes
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • April 16, 2014
    ...and the continuing application is filed by a juristic entity.14 A power of attorney given by inventors remains in effect where (1) a 37 CFR 1.48 request in a pending application or (2) a continuing application adds an inventor, if the added inventor supplies a power consistent with the init......
  • THE MIS-“CONCEPTION” OF BEING AN INVENTOR
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • November 12, 2014
    ...to any action brought after 6 years from the date that the patent issued. 1. 35 U.S.C. § 116 2. 35 U.S.C. § 256 3. 35 U.S.C. § 262 4. 37 C.F.R. § 1.48 (a) – (f) 5. 37 C.F.R. § 1.291 6. Fina Oil v. Ewen, 123 F.3d 1466, 1473 (Fed. Cir. 1997). 7. Coleman v. Dines, 754 F.2d 353, 359 (Fed. Cir. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Evolutionary Tales: Times of the Best and Worst
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Landslide Nbr. 10-1, September 2017
    • September 1, 2017
    ...LLC v. CSR PLC, 771 F.3d 1336, 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2014). 14. Id. 15. Id. 16. 754 F.3d 940 (Fed. Cir. 2014). 17. Id. at 946. 18. See 37 C.F.R. § 1.48(a). 19. See id. § 1.48(b). 20. See Ian Y. Liu & Leslie A. McDonell, AIA Breathes Life into Inventorship Correction in PTO , BNA’s Pat. Trademark ......
  • Righting Inventorship Wrongs?A Multijurisdictional Overview
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Landslide Nbr. 10-1, September 2017
    • September 1, 2017
    ...LLC v. CSR PLC, 771 F.3d 1336, 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2014). 14. Id. 15. Id. 16. 754 F.3d 940 (Fed. Cir. 2014). 17. Id. at 946. 18. See 37 C.F.R. § 1.48(a). 19. See id. § 1.48(b). 20. See Ian Y. Liu & Leslie A. McDonell, AIA Breathes Life into Inventorship Correction in PTO , BNA’s Pat. Trademark ......
  • Patent Drawings
    • United States
    • From Invention to Patent: A Scientist and Engineer's Guide
    • May 24, 2018
    ...●CHARACTER OF LINES, NUMBERS, AND LETTERS – 37 CFR 1.84(l) ●SHADING – 37 CFR 1.84(m) ●NUMBERS, LETTERS, AND REFERENCE CHARACTERS – 37 CFR 1.48(p) ●LEAD LINES – 37 CFR 1.84(q) ●NUMBERING OF SHEETS OF DRAWING – 37 CFR 1.84(t) ●NUMBERING OF VIEWS – 37 CFR 1.84(u) ●CORRECTIONS – 37 CFR 1.84(w) ......
1 forms

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT