36 C.F.R. §800.8 - Coordination With the National Environmental Policy Act

Cite as36 C.F.R. §800.8
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
42 cases
  • Indiana Coal Council, Inc. v. Lujan, Civ. A. No. 87-1016 (JHG)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 8 Octubre 1991
    ...1980, the Advisory Council, OSM, and the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers entered into a PMOA, pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 800.8 (1980), that required OSM to provide the Advisory Council with an opportunity to comment on applications for primacy by state programs prio......
  • Lesser v. City of Cape May, Civil Action No. 99-5575(JAP)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • 1 Septiembre 2000
    ...and the failure to do so resulted in irreparable harm. (Amended Complaint ¶¶ 111, 116). However, this contention lacks merit. Both 36 C.F.R. § 800.8 (1999) and 36 C.F.R. § 800.14 (1998) encourage, but do not require, such coordination. Consequently, the Court finds that the decision not to ......
  • Save Ardmore Coalition v. Lower Merion Township, 05-1668.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • 9 Noviembre 2005
    ...with the NEPA and other reviews, as well as with the overall planning process and schedule. 36 C.F.R. § 800.3(b); see also 36 C.F.R. § 800.8(a) ("Federal agencies are encouraged to coordinate compliance with [NHPA and As these regulations illustrate, Plaintiffs' claim under NHPA is simply n......
  • Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, CASE NO. 12cv1167-GPC(PCL)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of California)
    • 27 Febrero 2013
    ...800.9(a); determine whether the effect will be adverse, 36 C.F.R. §§ 800.5(c), 800.9(b); and avoid or mitigate any adverse effects, 36 C.F.R. §§ 800.8(e), 800.9(c). The Forest Service must confer with the State Historic Preservation Officer ("SHPO") and seek the approval of the Advisory Cou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT