40 CFR 1508.5 - Cooperating agency

Cite as40 CFR 1508.5
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
58 practice notes
17 cases
  • Wyoming v. U.S. Dept. of Agri., No. 01-CV-860B.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. District of Wyoming
    • July 14, 2003
    ...at pp. 6-7). The CEQ encouraged federal agencies to work with state and tribal governments. (AR, Doc. 3544, at pp. 2-3; 40 C.F.R. §§ 1501.6, 1508.5). Prior to Wyoming's request for cooperating agency status, the Roadless Team recognized that it had "an obligation to consider and routinely s......
  • Wyoming v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, No. 07-CV-17-B.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. District of Wyoming
    • August 12, 2008
    ...at pp. 6-7). The CEQ encouraged federal agencies to work with state and tribal governments. (AR, Doc. 3544, at pp. 2-3; 40 C.F.R. §§ 1501.6, 1508.5). Prior to Wyoming's request for cooperating agency status, the Roadless Team recognized that it had "an obligation to consider and routinely s......
  • Save Ardmore Coalition v. Lower Merion Township, No. 05-1668.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • November 9, 2005
    ...agency become a cooperating agency," it is still primarily the lead agency's responsibility to prepare an environmental review. 40 C.F.R. §§ 1508.5, 1508.16. Some circuits have noted that non-federal parties may be enjoined, pending completion of an environmental impact statement or assessm......
  • Alaska v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., Civil Case No. 11–1122 (RJL)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 20, 2017
    ...agency status is committed to the discretion of the agency and is not judicially reviewable under the APA. See 40 C.F.R. §§ 1501.6, 1508.5. This Court's role in reviewing Alaska's argument on this point therefore ends here.Third, Alaska complains that the USDA erred in declining to extend t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT