49 C.F.R. §382.215 - Controlled substances testing

Cite as49 C.F.R. §382.215
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • In re Terry, 1:16cv256
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Middle District of North Carolina
    • March 14, 2017
    ...completion of controlled substance education and/or treatment and a negative drug test result. See 49 C.F.R. § 40.305(a); see also 49 C.F.R. § 382.215 (prohibiting drivers from working if they test positive for a controlled substance and prohibiting "employer[s] having knowledge that a driv......
  • Scott v. Genuine Parts Company, Cause No. IP00-866 C-T/K (S.D. Ind. 2/1/2002), Cause No. IP00-866 C-T/K.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of Indiana)
    • February 1, 2002
    ...an employer from permitting a driver who has tested positive for controlled substances to perform safety sensitive functions. 49 C.F.R. § 382.215. Defendant's criteria on not hiring truck drivers with felony convictions and/or who have tested positive on a drug test, coupled with its well-f......
  • Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Am. Ry. & Airway Supervisors' Ass'n, Civil Action No. SA-17-CV-270-XR
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Western District of Texas
    • January 26, 2018
    ...a verified positive drug test result, you must immediately remove the employee involved from performing safety-sensitive functions."); 49 C.F.R. § 382.215 ("No driver shall report for duty, remain on duty or perform a safety-sensitive function, if the driver tests positive . . . for control......
  • Cherry v. Dep't of Educ., 58105300061009; A146526.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • October 24, 2012
    ...that petitioner had violated 49 C.F.R. § 382.213(a) by ingesting marijuana four days before she reported for duty and had violated 49 C.F.R. § 382.215 by testing positive for marijuana while on duty.The department rejected petitioner's contention that it had failed to adequately justify its......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT