37 CFR 1.915 - Content of request forreexamination
| Cite as | 37 CFR 1.915 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 practice notes
-
Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and Judicial Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decisions
...6 months. The estimate for inter partes review petitions is partially based on the number of inter partes reexamination requests under 37 CFR 1.915 that have been filed in fiscal years 2010 and The Office received 281 requests for inter partes reexamination in fiscal year 2010. See Table 13......
-
Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and Judicial Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decisions
...be filed. The estimate for inter partes review petitions is based partially on the number of inter partes reexamination requests under 37 CFR 1.915 that have been filed in fiscal years 2010, 2011 and the first half of fiscal year 2012. The rate of growth of inter partes reexamination filing......
-
Changes to Implement Inter Partes Review Proceedings
...fiscal year. The estimate for inter partes review petitions is partially based on the number of inter partes reexamination requests under 37 CFR 1.915 that have been filed in fiscal years 2010 and The Office received 281 requests for inter partes reexamination in fiscal year 2010. See Table......
-
Target Training Int'l, Ltd. v. Lee, No. C 13–3057–MWB.
...and obtain a filing date that precedes the last piece or part to be filed. Petitioner supports these arguments with the language of 37 C.F.R. § 1.915 and 37 C.F.R. § 1.919. It is agreed that Rule 915 requires third party requester to include a certificate of service in the Request and that ......
Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
-
Target Training Int'l, Ltd. v. Lee, No. C 13–3057–MWB.
...and obtain a filing date that precedes the last piece or part to be filed. Petitioner supports these arguments with the language of 37 C.F.R. § 1.915 and 37 C.F.R. § 1.919. It is agreed that Rule 915 requires third party requester to include a certificate of service in the Request and that ......
-
01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Citrix Sys., Inc., CASE NO. 1:06-cv-253
...limited inter partes reexamination requests to arguments based on prior art patents or printed publications.32 See 35 U.S.C. § 315(c) ; 37 C.F.R. § 1.915 (Effective May 16, 2007-September 22, 2011.) With this Communique does not disagree: “During reexamination, public documents can be argue......
-
Holt v. Garrido, Appeal 2012-000170
...request for inter partes reexamination, filed August 26, 2008, was vacated for failure to comply with the requirements set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 1.915(b). [5] Further to the issue raised by Requester, the following rejections were withdrawn by the Examiner pursuant to the RAN (See RAN 69-72;......
-
Dairy Health Products, Inc. v. Patent of Ib A, Inc., APPEAL 2010-007335
...Partes Reexamination was made by Dairy Health Products [hereinafter DHP] on November 16, 2007 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-318 and 37 C.F.R. § 1.915. DHP, who is the Third-Party Requester and Respondent in this appeal, cited six patents which were said to raise substantial new questions of ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Intellectual Property Quarterly Newsletter - Winter 2010
...to account for about 5% of all ex parte reexamination requests; see PAIR Study, supra). 4 MPEP §§ 2227 and 2627; 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.510(c) and 1.915(d). 5 35 U.S.C. §§ 303, 304, 312 and 313. 6 MPEP §§ 2216, 2242, 2616 and 2642. 7 35 U.S.C. § 303(a); In re Swanson, 540 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2008)......
-
Reexam Interrupted: The PTO Cracks Down on Filing Informalities
...to account for about 5% of all ex parte reexamination requests; see PAIR Study, supra). [4] MPEP §§ 2227 and 2627; 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.510(c) and 1.915(d). [5] 35 U.S.C. §§ 303, 304, 312 and 313. [6] MPEP §§ 2216, 2242, 2616 and 2642. [7] 35 U.S.C. § 303(a); In re Swanson, 540 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Ci......
-
IN RE TROLL BUSTERS BEWARE: FAILURE TO DISCLOSE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST WHEN FILING AN INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION
...questions arose as to whether the actual real party in interest was correctly identified as required by 35 U.S.C. § 311(b)(1) and 37 C.F.R. 1.915(b)(8). On their website, Troll Busters proclaims that “Troll Busters invalidates patents, not just any patents but patents being asserted by pate......
1 books & journal articles
-
Necessity: Enacting Laws to Protect Indigenous Intellectual Property Rights in the United States
...a natural pesticide, from crushed seeds using the solvent "aprotic" as opposed to water, the traditional 74 Id. 75 35 U.S.C. § 311; 37 C.F.R. § 1.915. 76 35 U.S.C. § 102 (2007). 77 Sapp, supra note 17, at 193. 78 Id. 79 Id. 80 Id. 81 Id. at 193–94. 82 Sapp, supra note 17, at 193. Winter 201......