37 CFR 1.915 - Content of request forreexamination

Cite as37 CFR 1.915
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 cases
  • 01 Communique Lab., Inc. v. Citrix Sys., Inc.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Ohio
    • 21 d1 Dezembro d1 2015
    ...limited inter partes reexamination requests to arguments based on prior art patents or printed publications.32 See 35 U.S.C. § 315(c) ; 37 C.F.R. § 1.915 (Effective May 16, 2007-September 22, 2011.) With this Communique does not disagree: “During reexamination, public documents can be argue......
  • Target Training Int'l, Ltd. v. Lee
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. Northern District of Iowa
    • 5 d3 Março d3 2014
    ...and obtain a filing date that precedes the last piece or part to be filed. Petitioner supports these arguments with the language of 37 C.F.R. § 1.915 and 37 C.F.R. § 1.919. It is agreed that Rule 915 requires third party requester to include a certificate of service in the Request and that ......
  • Holt v. Garrido
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • 28 d3 Março d3 2012
    ...request for inter partes reexamination, filed August 26, 2008, was vacated for failure to comply with the requirements set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 1.915(b). [5] Further to the issue raised by Requester, the following rejections were withdrawn by the Examiner pursuant to the RAN (See RAN 69-72;......
  • Dairy Health Products, Inc. v. Patent of Ib A, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • 25 d3 Agosto d3 2010
    ...Partes Reexamination was made by Dairy Health Products [hereinafter DHP] on November 16, 2007 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-318 and 37 C.F.R. § 1.915. DHP, who is the Third-Party Requester and Respondent in this appeal, cited six patents which were said to raise substantial new questions of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Necessity: Enacting Laws to Protect Indigenous Intellectual Property Rights in the United States
    • United States
    • Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems No. 19-3, January 2011
    • 1 d6 Janeiro d6 2011
    ...a natural pesticide, from crushed seeds using the solvent "aprotic" as opposed to water, the traditional 74 Id. 75 35 U.S.C. § 311; 37 C.F.R. § 1.915. 76 35 U.S.C. § 102 (2007). 77 Sapp, supra note 17, at 193. 78 Id . 79 Id . 80 Id . 81 Id . at 193–94. 82 Sapp, supra note 17, at 193. Winter......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT