21 C.F.R. §610.60 - Container label

Cite as21 C.F.R. §610.60
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Mazur v. Merck & Co., Inc., Civ. A. No. 85-6494.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • June 29, 1990
    ...expiration date, the storage directions, the indications and contraindications of vaccine usage, and the potential adverse reactions. 21 C.F.R. §§ 610.60-610.65. The language of the label and package circular is subject to FDA scrutiny and cannot be changed without FDA authorization. 21 C.F......
  • Graham v. Wyeth Laboratories, 85-1481-K.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. District of Kansas
    • July 22, 1987
    ...is indicated and contraindicated; and (4) the product's potential adverse reactions which have been associated with the product's use. 21 C.F.R. §§ 610.60-610.65. The language used is subject to FDA approval, 21 C.F.R. §§ 1, 201; 50 Fed.Reg. 51108 (1985), and, once approved, the language ca......
  • Jones By Jones v. Lederle Laboratories, 85 CV 949.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • August 1, 1988
    ...and toxicity are prescribed. See id. §§ 620.4, .5. Finally, the general labeling requirements for biological drugs are set forth at 21 C.F.R. §§ 610.60-.65. As of June 1979, the Lederle DTP vaccine Tri-Immunol satisfied all of the relevant requirements, and was licensed by the FDA. The vacc......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT