24 CFR 203.604 - Contact with the mortgagor

Cite as24 CFR 203.604
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
280 practice notes
  • Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 13 Diciembre 2012
    ...servicing requirements, as they did not have a face-to-face interview with them as required by the Code of Federal Regulations.6 (See 24 C.F.R. § 203.604; see also 24 C.F.R. § 203.500.) They maintain that the HUD regulations are conditions precedent that must be complied with prior to a mor......
  • Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., A133071
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 20 Febrero 2013
    ...servicing requirements, as they did not have a face-to-face interview with them as required by the Code of Federal Regulations.6 (See 24 C.F.R. § 203.604; see also 24 C.F.R. § 203.500.) They maintain that the HUD regulations are conditions precedent that must be complied with prior to a mor......
  • Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Neal, No. 58, September Term, 2006 (Md. App. 3/13/2007), No. 58, September Term, 2006.
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • 13 Marzo 2007
    ...in this case, is a required face-to-face interview between the mortgagor and mortgagee before three months of delinquency accrues. 24 C.F.R. § 203.604(b). 10. See, e.g., Vaughn v. Consumer Home Mortgage, Inc., 293 F. Supp. 2d 206, 210 n.2 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) ("HUD cites Cort v. Ash for the prop......
  • In Re William D. Shirk, Bankruptcy No. 09-35487.
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Sixth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • 30 Septiembre 2010
    ...1949-50. Assuming, however, that the Shirks set forth a plausible claim, it appears that that claim arises from the interpretation of 24 C.F.R. § 203.604, the regulation of the Housing and Urban Development Administration (“HUD”) requiring a face to face meeting under certain circumstances ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
252 cases
  • Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 13 Diciembre 2012
    ...servicing requirements, as they did not have a face-to-face interview with them as required by the Code of Federal Regulations.6 (See 24 C.F.R. § 203.604; see also 24 C.F.R. § 203.500.) They maintain that the HUD regulations are conditions precedent that must be complied with prior to a mor......
  • Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., A133071
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 20 Febrero 2013
    ...servicing requirements, as they did not have a face-to-face interview with them as required by the Code of Federal Regulations.6 (See 24 C.F.R. § 203.604; see also 24 C.F.R. § 203.500.) They maintain that the HUD regulations are conditions precedent that must be complied with prior to a mor......
  • Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Neal, No. 58, September Term, 2006 (Md. App. 3/13/2007), No. 58, September Term, 2006.
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • 13 Marzo 2007
    ...in this case, is a required face-to-face interview between the mortgagor and mortgagee before three months of delinquency accrues. 24 C.F.R. § 203.604(b). 10. See, e.g., Vaughn v. Consumer Home Mortgage, Inc., 293 F. Supp. 2d 206, 210 n.2 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) ("HUD cites Cort v. Ash for the prop......
  • In Re William D. Shirk, Bankruptcy No. 09-35487.
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Sixth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • 30 Septiembre 2010
    ...1949-50. Assuming, however, that the Shirks set forth a plausible claim, it appears that that claim arises from the interpretation of 24 C.F.R. § 203.604, the regulation of the Housing and Urban Development Administration (“HUD”) requiring a face to face meeting under certain circumstances ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT